Impact of Board Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Ghana
Abstract
This study examines the impact of board characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in Ghana. It uses panel data covering 15 financial years which was extracted from the companies’ annual report to test the hypothesis using OLS regression. The results provide evidence that board characteristics such as size, board independence, board members below age 40, foreign nationals on board and gender diversity has a positive and significant impact on the CSR disclosure in Ghana. Board size recorded a negative and significant impact on CSR disclosure while women as board chairperson recorded no significant impact on CSR disclosure. In terms of structural break, the results indicate that, there is no structural break at 1% and 5%. However, at 10%, there is structural break. Based on these findings, the study recommends that, board size should be made up of minimum of 5 and maximum of 9. Again, there should be gender diversity, more independent directors, foreign nationals and younger board members below age 40 to ensure effectiveness and full disclosure of CSR in listed companies in Ghana.References
. Mackey, A., T.B. Mackey, and J.B. Barney, Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of management review, 2007. 32(3): p. 817-835.
. Godfrey, P.C., Corporate social responsibility in sport: An overview and key issues. Journal of sport management, 2015. 23(6): p. 698-716.
. Miller, T. and M. del Carmen Triana, Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management studies, 2009. 46(5): p. 755-786.
. Akhtaruddin, M., et al., Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 2018. 7(1): p. 1.
. Hafsi, T. and G. Turgut, Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of business ethics, 2013. 112(3): p. 463-479.
. Rao, K. and C. Tilt, Board diversity and CSR reporting: An Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 2016. 24(2): p. 182-210.
. Rouf, A. and A.-A. Harun, Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure in annual reports of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 2011. 5(1).
. Van Ness, R.K., P. Miesing, and J. Kang, Board of director composition and financial performance in a Sarbanes-Oxley world. Academy of Business and Economics Journal, 2010. 10(5): p. 56-74.
. Kang, H., M. Cheng, and S.J. Gray, Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2007. 15(2): p. 194-207.
. Firer, S. and S. Mitchell Williams, Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of intellectual capital, 2003. 4(3): p. 348-360.
. Chapple, W., et al., The effects of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Г Unpublished.(available from the authors), 2017.
. Barako, D.G. and A.M. Brown, Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management & Governance, 2008. 12(4): p. 309.
. Van der Walt, N. and C. Ingley, Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2003. 11(3): p. 218-234.
. Carter, D.A., B.J. Simkins, and W.G. Simpson, Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 2016. 38(1): p. 33-53.
. Chapple, W., et al., The effects of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Unpublished.[available from the authors], 2007.
. Khan, H.-U.-Z., The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 2013. 52(2): p. 82-109.
. Haniffa, R.M. and T.E. Cooke, The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of accounting and public policy, 2005. 24(5): p. 391-430.
. Saleh Al Arussi, A., M. Hisyam Selamat, and M. Mohd Hanefah, Determinants of financial and environmental disclosures through the internet by Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 2009. 17(1): p. 59-76.
. Barako, D.G. and A.M. Brown, Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management & Governance, 2018. 12(4): p. 309.
. Fifka, M.S., Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective–a review of the empirical literature and a meta‐analysis. Business strategy and the environment, 2017. 22(1): p. 1-35.
. Roberts, J., T. McNulty, and P. Stiles, Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non‐executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British journal of management, 2005. 16(s1).
. Gul, F.A. and S. Leung, Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 2014. 23(5): p. 351-379.
. Ntim, C.G., Board diversity and organizational valuation: unravelling the effects of ethnicity and gender. Journal of Management & Governance, 2015. 19(1): p. 167-195.
. Isidro, H. and M. Sobral, The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015. 132(1): p. 1-19.
. Bear, S., N. Rahman, and C. Post, The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016. 97(2): p. 207-221.
. Greenwood, C.A., Whistleblowing in the Fortune 1000: What practitioners told us about wrongdoing in corporations in a pilot study. Public Relations Review, 2015. 41(4): p. 490-500.
. King, P., Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Spotlighting Wisconsin. Wis. JL Gender, & Soc'y, 2017. 32: p. 1.
. McWilliams, A., D.S. Siegel, and P.M. Wright, Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies, 2016. 43(1): p. 1-18.
. Barako, D.G., P. Hancock, and H. Izan, Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: an international review, 2006. 14(2): p. 107-125.
. Lioui, A. and Z. Sharma, Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 2012. 78: p. 100-111.
. Prado‐Lorenzo, J.M., I. Gallego‐Alvarez, and I.M. Garcia‐Sanchez, Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009. 16(2): p. 94-107.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.
