Different Influence of End Range Mobilization and Mobilization With Movement on Improving Motional Scope of Non Specific Frozen Shoulder

Authors

  • Hasbiah Hasbiah Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic of Health Makassar, Makassar 90241, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Awal Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic of Health Makassar, Makassar 90241, Indonesia
  • Andi Halimah Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic of Health Makassar, Makassar 90241, Indonesia
  • Anwar Sarman Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic of Health Makassar, Makassar 90241, Indonesia

Keywords:

End Range Mobilization, Mobilization With Movement, Scope of Movement, Goniometer.

Abstract

Limited joints are loss of active and passive mobility capability of a body joint resulting in disruption of daily activities. Limitations of movement in all directions are characteristic of frozen shoulder sufferers. This study aimed to examine the effect of end mobilization and mobilization with movement on increasing the scope of joint motion in frozen shoulder patients in Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar from April to June 2017. The research method was Quasi Experiment with design of Two Groups Pre test- Post test. Population were all frozen shoulder patients who get physiotherapy treatment in Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar. Sampling technique was done by purposive sampling then obtained the number of samples of 16 respondents. Divided into 2 groups, group 1 is 8 respondents who are given intervention of end range mobilization and group 2 that is 8 respondents who are given mobilization with movement intervention. Based on Wilcoxon test result in treatment group I end range mobilization for abduction shoulder movement with p value = 0,008 and shoulder exorotation with p value = 0,020 and shoulder endorotation movement with p value = 0,025. While in the treatment group II mobilization with movement for abduction movement shoulder with p value = 0.008 and shoulder exorotation with p value = 0,011 and shoulder endorotation movement with p value = 0,023. Both treatment groups had an effect on increasing the scope of joint motion in frozen shoulder patients. Based on the result of Mann-Whitney difference test obtained abduction movement shoulder p-value = 0,013 (p <0,05) and for shoulder parsing movement equal to p-value = 0,023 (p <0,05).

Then there was the difference of effect between treatment I end range mobilization with treatment II mobilization with movement. But for endorotation movement shoulder got p-value = 0,074 which means there is no difference of influence between treatment I end mobilization range with treatment II mobilization with movement. It is concluded that mobilization with movement is more effective than end range mobilization in increasing the scope of joint motion for the limitations of shoulder abduction and shoulder exorotation in frozen shoulder patients. But for the limitations of shoulder endorotation there is no significant effect.

References

. Dewi, K., Akupunktur sebagai Terapi pada Frozen Shoulder. Jurnal Kedokteran Maranatha, 2013. 11(1).

. Hand, G., et al., The pathology of frozen shoulder. Bone & Joint Journal, 2007. 89(7): p. 928-932.

. Donatelli, R., et al., Frozen shoulder encapsulates therapy challenges. Biomechanics, 2006. 2: p. 31-46.

. Robinson, C., et al., Frozen shoulder. Bone & Joint Journal, 2012. 94(1): p. 1-9.

. Gispen, J., Painful shoulder and the reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Arthritis and Allied Conditions. A Textbook of Rheumatology 14th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: p. 2095-142.

. Irfan, M., Wismanto, and A.C. Meidian, Modul Praktikum Topik Pengukuran Lingkup Gerak Sendi Bahu (Shoulder Joint). 2013, Jakarta: Universitas Esa Unggul.

. Trisnowiyanto, B., Beda Pengaruh Intervensi Peregangan dan Mobilisasi Sendi terhadap Perbaikan Keterbatasan Lingkup Gerak Sendi. Jurnal Kesehatan, 2016. 7(2): p. 182-188.

. Kumar, A., et al., Effectiveness of Maitland Techniques in idiopathic shoulder adhesive capsulitis. International Scholarly Research Network Rehabilitation, 2012. 2012.

. Mueller, M.J. and K.S. Maluf, Tissue adaptation to physical stress: a proposed “Physical Stress Theory” to guide physical therapist practice, education, and research. Physical therapy, 2002. 82(4): p. 383-403.

. Yang, J.-l., et al., Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial. Physical therapy, 2007. 87(10): p. 1307-1315.

. Kisner, C. and L.A. Colby, Therapeutic exercise. 2007, Philadelphia: F.A Davis Company.

. Threlkeld, A.J., The effects of manual therapy on connective tissue. Physical therapy, 1992. 72(12): p. 893-902.

. Vermeulen, H.M., et al., End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a multiple-subject case report. Physical Therapy, 2000. 80(12): p. 1204-1213.

. Teys, P., L. Bisset, and B. Vicenzino, The initial effects of a Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique on range of movement and pressure pain threshold in pain-limited shoulders. Manual therapy, 2008. 13(1): p. 37-42.

. Kachingwe, A.F., et al., Comparison of manual therapy techniques with therapeutic exercise in the treatment of shoulder impingement: a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial. Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2008. 16(4): p. 238-247.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-11

How to Cite

Hasbiah, H., Awal, M., Halimah, A., & Sarman, A. (2018). Different Influence of End Range Mobilization and Mobilization With Movement on Improving Motional Scope of Non Specific Frozen Shoulder. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 37(3), 136–149. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8762

Issue

Section

Articles