The Effectiveness of Think Talk Write Learning Model in Improving Students

Authors

  • Nida Ul Husnah Mathematics Education of Postgraduate State University of Medan , St. Williem Iskandar Psr. V, Medan 20221, Indonesia
  • Edy Surya Mathematics Education of Postgraduate State University of Medan , St. Williem Iskandar Psr. V, Medan 20221, Indonesia

Keywords:

Think Talk Write Learning Model, Students' mathematical communication skills.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the mathematical communication skills of students using Think Talk Write model is better than students using conventional learning methods and whether the use of Think Talk Write Learning Model is effective to improve students' mathematical communication skills. The population was students of grade VIII. The sample of the experimental class was class VIII-4 consisting of 35 students and control class was class VIII-5 consisting of 35 students. The type of research used in this study was quasi experiment. The results of the study found in the experimental class after the Think Talk Write model was applied is that the average grade of students increased from 34.14 on pretest to 84.71 on post-test or increased by 50.57. While in the control class, students' mathematical communication skills increased by 44, from 26.71 on pretest to 70.71 on post-test. Based on the results of hypothesis test calculation, it was obtained tcount = 5.259. Furthermore, tcount results were compared with ttable with significant level ? = 0.05, then it was obtained ttable = 2.052. Thus it can be said tcount> ttable that is 5.259> 2.052. Then Ha was accepted with a hypothesis stating that the use of Think Talk Write Model is effective in improving students

References

Soedjadi. Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2000.

Bambang, R.

Kosko, Karl W and Jesse L.M. Walkins. (2010). Mathematical Communication and Its Relation to the Frequency of Manipulative Use. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education (IEJME),5(2): 79-90.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematic (NCTM). Curriculum and Evaluation Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 1989.

Percival, Fred and Henry Ellington. A Handbook of Educational Technology. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1984.

Ansari, Bansu I. Komunikasi Matematik. Banda Aceh : Yayasan Pena Banda Aceh, 2009.

DePorter & Hernacki. Quantum Learning. NewYork: Dell Publishing, 1992.

Arends, Richards I. Classroom Instruction and Management. New York: McGraw Hill.

Huinker, D. dan Laughlin, C.

Masingila, J., Davidenko, S. & Prus-Wisniowska, E. Mathematics Learning and Practice in and out of School: A framework for connecting these experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1996, 31 (1-2), 175-200.

Yamin Martinis. Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Gaung Persada Press, 2008.

Sukardi. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.

Lusia Ari Sumirat. (2014).

Sari Rahma Chandra, Ahmad Fauzan, Helma. (2014).

Suyatno. Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Sidoarjo:Masmedia Buana Pusaka, 2009.

Iskandar wassid dan Suhendar. Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-21

How to Cite

Ul Husnah, N., & Surya, E. (2017). The Effectiveness of Think Talk Write Learning Model in Improving Students. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/7531

Issue

Section

Articles