Indoor Air Quality and Prevalence of Sick Building Syndrome among University Laboratory Workers

Authors

  • Zuliza Md Saad Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Dr. Irniza Rasdi Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Dr. Emilia Zainal Abidin Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

Keywords:

Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), Sick Building Syndrome (SBS), dry and wet laboratories.

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the association between indoor air quality (IAQ) and prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS) among laboratory workers. A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 264 laboratory workers in a private university (88% response rate). A self-administrated questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence of SBS. Temperature, air movement, relative humidity (RH), concentration of carbon monoxide, (CO) carbon dioxide (CO2) and total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) were measured objectively in 55 laboratories. The average temperature of dry laboratories was significantly higher (M=25.110C) than wet laboratories (M=23.770C). The mean of CO in wet laboratories (M=1.15ppm) was significantly higher than in dry laboratories (M=0.89ppm), (p<0.002). The prevalence of SBS among respondents at wet laboratories was significantly higher (45.4%) compared to dry laboratories (20%), (?2 = 19.5). The most prevalent reported symptoms were drowsiness (18.5%), followed by irritated stuffy runny nose (13.4%), headache (10.9%), and skin rashes or itchiness (10.1%). At dry laboratories, higher temperature was found to be significantly associated with SBS among workers (?2=-0.38, p =0.042). Low temperature and higher CO at wet laboratories were found to be significantly associated with SBS (?2 =-0.33, p =0.021) and (?2 =-0.24, p =0.044).

In summary, this study revealed that poor IAQ affects the SBS among workers at both laboratories. Thus, further assessment and remedial action are warranted to reduce the SBS symptoms among laboratory workers.

References

. Sundell J.

. J.D. Spengler, Q. Chen.

. S.N. Kamaruzzaman, N.A. Sabrani.

. A.P. Jones.

. Y.H. Mi, D. Norb

. H. Yau, B.T. Chew, A.Z.A. Saifullah.

. M.G. Apte, W.J. Fisk, J.M. Daisey.

. D.H. Tsai, J.S. Lin, C.C. Chan.

. KR. Smith.

. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Indoor Air Facts: Sick Building Syndrome: US, 1997

. P.L. Ooi, K.T. Goh, M.H. Phoon, S.C. Foo, H.M. Yap.

. O.A. Sepp

. O.A. Seppanen, W.J. Fisk, Q.H. Lei. Room temperature and productivity in office work. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2006.

. C.J. Bruce. Technical Bulletin Science Laboratories and Indoor Air Quality in Schools 1994

. The OSHA laboratory standard factsheet (2011) U.S Department of labour. [On-line] Available: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/laboratories/ [November 16, 2015].

. A. Norhidayah, L. Chia-Kuang, M.K. Azhar, S. Nurulwahida.

. R. Nur Fadilah, J. Juliana.

. M.A. Nor Dina, A. Zainal Abidin, R. Wahid.

. Department Occupational Safety and Health. Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality, Ministry of Human Resources Malaysia, 2010

. L. Fang, G. Clausen, P.O. Fanger.

. M. Jonathan, M.D. Samet.

. N.M. Eriksson, B.G.T. Stenberg. Baseline prevalence of symptoms related to indoor environment. Scand J Public Health, vol. 34, pp. 387

Downloads

Published

2016-08-23

How to Cite

Md Saad, Z., Rasdi, D. I., & Abidin, D. E. Z. (2016). Indoor Air Quality and Prevalence of Sick Building Syndrome among University Laboratory Workers. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 29(2), 130–140. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/6162

Issue

Section

Articles