Regional Sustainable Development in Bali: The Role of Indigeneous Institution of Subak in Retarding Farm Land Conversion

Authors

  • Widhianthini Widhianthini Graduate School of Regional and Rural Development Planning, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Arya Hadi Dharmawan Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Noer Azam Achsani Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Setia Hadi Faculty of Agricultural, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Keywords:

indigenous institution, land conversion, food security, sustainable development, Subak, Bali.

Abstract

By entering those elements, new models in the dynamic system will be obtained and it concluded that indigenous institution is an aspect that should be taken into the modeling of spatial planning in a region or area so that the problems of food security, land conversion can be eliminated as early as possible and obtainable alternatives policies could be taken by policy makers for each region.

Spatial planning processes are often faced with problems no matter how good and perfect the spatial plans are, but to make it happen there are always be the selection of priority operational steps. Many factors must be considered integrally and synergistically in spatial use, for example, components of natural resources, artificial resources, the environment, and the technical components and forming the other regions. The use of dynamic systems in developing regions has several advantages, including the improvement of the territorial dimension, facilitated of participatory process, anticipatory networks of future scenarios, and innovation in public policy arrangement. A model of sustainable tourism in Tabanan showed that local institutional aspects (Subak) became one of the driving force key in reducing land conversion. It is necessary to do the expansion of the indigenous institutional aspects, especially in the aspect of granting autonomy for Subak in spatial planning and evaluation in the tourism area which became a shelter for the local institutions, includes not only the autonomy management of water irrigation.

References

Barlowe, R. 1978. Land Resource Economic. Michigan State University, Printice.

Boettke P, Christopher J, and Peter TL, 2008. Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 67, Issue 2, (April, 2008): 331-358.

Coria J and Enrique C, 2012. Ecotourism and the Development of Indigenous Communities: the good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of Ecological Economics. Vol. 73, [January, 15, 2012]: 47-55.

Daalen V and W.A.H. Thissen, 2001. Dynamics Systems Modelling Continuous Models. Faculteit Techniek, Bestuur en Management (TBM). Technische Universiteit Delft.

Dharmawan AH, et al., 2007. Konversi Lahan Pertanian dan Perubahan Struktur Agraria. Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Mulyaharaja, Kecamatan Bogor Selatan, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat. Sodality: Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekologi Manusia. Vol. 01, No. 02, (Agustus 2007): 253-270.

Eriyatno, 2012. Ilmu Sistem. Meningkatkan Mutu dan Efektivitas Manajemen. Penerbit Guna Widya, Surabaya.

Forrester, Jay W, 1998. Designing the Future, at Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla Spain. December 15 (1998).

Jones S, 2005. Community Based Tourism:The Significance of Social Capital. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 32, No. 2 (2005): 303

Noer M

Ostrom,V, l990. Polycentricity. In Polycentricity and Local public Economies (ed: MD McGinnis), The Univ.of Michigan Press, USA.

Pakpahan, Agus, Sumaryanto, N. Syafa

Paraso A, 2013. Efektivitas Badan Permusyawaratan Desa Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengawasan Pemerintahan Di Desa Sereh (Suatu Studi Di Desa Sereh Kecamatan Lirung Kabupaten Kepulauan Talaud. Jurnal Eksekutif. [Internet]. [13 Februari 2014]. Diunduh dari https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/2693

Powell R and SH Ham, 2008. Can Ecotourism Interpretation Really Lead to Pro-Conservation Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol.16, Issue 4, p. 467-489.

Scheyvens R, 2009. Ecotourism and The Empowerment of Local Communities. Tourism Management. Vol. 20, Issue 2 (April 2009): 245-249.

Schlager E and Ostrom E, 1992. Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: Aconceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68 (3): 249-262.

Sharpley R., 2008. Ecotourism: A Consumption Perspective. Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 5, Issue 1-2, p. 7-22.

Shikida A, Mami Y, Akiko K, and Masayuki M, 2010. Tourism Relationship Model and Intermediary for Sustainable Tourism Management. Hokkaido University, Japan.

Sterman J, 2000.

Sterman, J., Henderson, R., Beinhocker, E., and Newman, L, 2007. Getting Big too Fast:Strategic Dynamics with Increasing Returns and Bounded Rationally. Management Science, 53(4): 683-696.

Tarigan H dan Pantjar Simatupang. 2014. Dampak Undang-Undang Sumber Daya Air Terhadap Eksistensi Kelembagaan Subak di Bali. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. Vol. 12, No. 2 (Desember 2014): 103-117

Thavarasukha V, 2009. Ecotourism Case Studies in Thailand. Chapter Twenty-Seven, Thailand.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-26

How to Cite

Widhianthini, W., Dharmawan, A. H., Achsani, N. A., & Hadi, S. (2016). Regional Sustainable Development in Bali: The Role of Indigeneous Institution of Subak in Retarding Farm Land Conversion. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 25(3), 70–84. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/5332

Issue

Section

Articles