Model of Occupational Health Services in the Company of State Owned Enterprise X in South Sulawesi

Authors

  • Suharni A.Fachrin Faculty of Public Health, Indonesian Muslim University, Makassar
  • Tjipto Suwandi Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya
  • Syamsiar S.Russeng Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar
  • Darmawansyah Darmawansyah

Keywords:

Occupational health services, the company of stateowned enterprise, conceptual model.

Abstract

The implementation of occupational health services has not given a maximum result. This is proven by the fact that the satisfaction statement of occupational health services is moderate. Occupational health services in companies generally are only curative, whereas preventive, promotive, and rehabilitative get less attention. This is because the absence of a model of occupational health services-based observance of rules and employee satisfaction oriented on the productivity in state-owned enterprise company. This study wanted to develop a model of occupational health services-based observance of rules and employee satisfaction oriented on the productivity in state-owned enterprise X (SOE X) company in South Sulawesi. This study used mixed method approach, exploratory study with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Collecting data were by interviews, questionnaires and documents. Data were analyzed by SEM (Structural Equation Model) with the help of the program AMOS version 22. The findings show the most employees characteristics were male (93,2%) with high school as the level of education (65,5%). About the implementation of occupational health services, basically the company has implemented.

The company is obedient and submissive to the regulation of labor ministerno.03 in 1982 concerning to the occupational health services and the open-minded company to the regulation of occupational health services. Based on empirical facts, the results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for all variables show that the developed indicators have a significant degree of correlation statistically, have a value loading factor of more than 0,30, and all are above 50%. That means that the developed indicators are a significant indicator to measure the variables in question, namely variables: (1) preventive, 25 indicators (96%), (2) promotion, 8 indicators (82%), (3) curative, 3 indicators (50%), (4) rehabilitative, 5 indicators (62%), (5) the commitment, 11 indicators (100%), (6) monitoring, 8 indicators (89%), (7) the observance/compliance, 10 indicators (100%), (8) the satisfaction, 14 indicators (87%), and (9) productivity, 9 indicators (82%). This result is based on the assumption of p-value as a belief function, where Ho is rejected with a confidence level of 1-p as reference in this study. It can be concluded that overall, the construction of the theory that builds operational definition of all the variables are supported/accordance with the empirical facts. In conclusion, the dimensions of occupational health services include customer satisfaction and productivity. Satisfaction dimensions were measured and constructed by seven (7) variables, namely preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, commitments, monitoring, and compliance/adherence. Productive dimensions were measured by 8 (eight) variables, namely preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, commitment, surveillance, observance of the rules/compliance, and satisfaction. SEM model of occupational health services development in the company of SOE X in South Sulawesi put construct preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, commitments, monitoring, and compliance/adherence as exogenous variable and satisfaction as an intervening variable that directs all to the productivity as endogenous variables.

References

Fedotov IA. And Rantanen J. 2005. Occupational Health Services as a Key element of National Occupational Safety and Health Systems. SJWEH Suppl 2005; no.1:16-18.

Husman K and Husman Paivi. 2005. Human Resource Needs of Modern Occupational Health Services- the case in Finland. SJWEH Suppl 2005; no 1:46-50.

ILO 1985.Occupational Health Services Convention.Convention No.161

ILO.2010. Recording and Notification of Occupational Accidents and Diseases and ILO list of Occupational diseases. http://www.ilo.org/

Alli BO. 2008. Fundamental Principles Of Occupational Health and Safety. Second Edition. ILO, Geneva.

ILO and WHO. 2003. Thirteenth Session of the Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health. Report of the Committee.

Meyer, J and N. Allen. 1984. Testing the

Shultz, D.P., Shultz,S.E. 1993. Psychology and Work Today an Introduction to Industrial and Organizational 6th Edition. Newyork : Mc Milan Publising.

Gallagher C. 2010. Health and Safety Management System- An Analysis of System Types and Effectiveness.

Schulte, Paul A,; Pandalai, Sudha; Wulsin, Victoria at all. 2012. Interaction of occupational and Personal Risk Factors in Workforce Health and Safety. American Journal of Public Health 102.3 (Mar 2012): 434-48

Bislimovska JK, Minov J, Risteska S, Stoleski S, Mijakoski D. Occupational Helath Services-Key Tool In The Development of Workers- Health As Public Health Approach.

Sutjana D.P., Tirtayasa K.,Widana K.,Adiputra N.,and Manuaba 2006.Improvement of working posture increases productivity of roof tile home industry workers at darmasaba village. In ergonomics for productivity and safe work. Abstract. Featuring the fourth SEAS conference, Thailand.

Froneberg B. 2005. Challenge in Occupational Safety and Health from the Global Market Economy and from Demografic Change-Facts, Trends, Policy Response and Actual need for Preventive Occupational Health Services in Europe. SJWEH Suppl 2005;no.1:23-27

Germain. G.L, Arnold R.M,.Rowan Richard, Roane J.R. Safety, Health, Environment and Quality Management. Second Edition. A Practitioner

Manuaba. 1994. Ergonomics Productivity Enhancement at The Government Owned Sugar Cane Limited Number XXI-XXII in East Java Indonesia. In Ergonomics for Productivity and Safe Work. Absrtact. Featuring the Fourth SEAS Conference, Thailand.

Maravellas C. 2012. Occupational Health Services and the Socialization of the Post-Fordist Employee. Nordic Journal of Social Research, Vol.3 2012.

Tiro M.A; Sukarna, 2014. Pemodelan Untuk Pembuat Keputusan.Andira Publisher, Makassar.

Ahola M, Kaustia T, Taskinen A. 2004. Good Occupational Health Practice. A Guide For Planning and Follow-up of Occupational Health Services. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Finnish Institut of Occupational Health. Helsinki.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-27

How to Cite

A.Fachrin, S., Suwandi, T., S.Russeng, S., & Darmawansyah, D. (2015). Model of Occupational Health Services in the Company of State Owned Enterprise X in South Sulawesi. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 24(7), 357–381. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/5102

Issue

Section

Articles