Mechanisms Employed by Grade 1 Teachers in Handling Pupils with and without Pre-Elementary Education in Biliran Division

Authors

  • Karen C. Raz Naval State University, Naval, Biliran 6543, Philippines
  • Francisco M. Ebio Naval State University, Naval, Biliran 6543, Philippines

Keywords:

education, mechanisms, pre-elementary education.

Abstract

The study generally aimed to ascertain the mechanisms employed by Grade 1 teachers in handling pupils with and without pre-elementary education in the Division of Biliran. It utilized the qualitative and survey research design. Through a series of personal interviews, 32 teachers who were handling Grade 1 pupils with and without pre-elementary education served as respondents. Majority of the respondents were graduates of BS Elementary Education and all of them were qualified to teach Grade 1 level. They have been teaching Grade 1 for 0.5 to 30 years, with a mean of 10.6 years. There were 22 mechanisms employed by the teachers in handling Grade 1 pupils with and without pre-elementary education. There were 12 mechanisms that were used both to pupils with and without pre-elementary education. The mechanisms employed were related to honing the skills of pupils in reading, writing, counting and interpersonal relations. High level learning activities were not introduced to pupils without pre-elementary education. There were 16 problems met by the teachers in handling Grade 1 pupils with and without pre-elementary education. These problems were related to the limited skills and readiness of the pupils in formal education, lack of support of parents, and limited supply of instructional materials.

References

Department of Education (DepEd). National Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) System for Pre-School Education, (2009).

Country Profile of Philippine Early Childhood Care and Education Programs, (2006).

S. Poland. Homeless youth in our schools. District Administration, 46(3), 68, (2010).

E. Powers-Costelo& K. Swick. Exploring the dynamics of teacher perceptions of homeless children and families during the early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 241-245, (2008).

J. Kim. Confronting invisibility: Early childhood pre-service teachers

J. Landsman. Bearers of hope. Educational Leadership,63(5), 26-32, (2006).

A. S. Knowlton. Helping the homeless: What educators can do to ease the pain? Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(1), 17-19, (2006).

K. Monkman, L. MacGillivray& C. H. Leyva. Literacy on three planes: Infusing social justice and culture into classroom instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 245-258, (2003).

A. Aviles de Bradley. Unaccompanied homeless youth: Intersections of homelessness, school experiences and educational policy. Child & Youth Services, 32(2), 155-172, (2011).

J. C. Isernhagen& N. Bulkin. The impact of mobility on student performance and teacher practice. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 16(1), 17-24, (2011).

D. H. Gruman, T. W. Harachi, R. D. Abbott, R. F. Catalano & C. B. Fleming. Longitudinal effects of student mobility on three dimensions of elementary school engagement. Child Development, 79(6), 1833-1852, (2008).

C. M. Shields & A. Warke. The invisible crisis: Connecting schools with homeless families. Journal of School Leadership,20(6), 789-819, (2010).

R. A. Hall. Homeless students and the public school system. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(3), 9-12, (2007).

J. F. Murphy & K. J. Tobin. Homelessness comes to school: How homeless children and youths can succeed. Phi Delta Kappan,93(3), 32-37, (2011).

L. MacGillivray, A. L. Ardell& M. S. Curwen. Supporting the literacy development of children living in homeless shelters. Reading Teacher, 63(5), 384-392, (2010).

P. A. Popp, L. W. Grant & J. H. Stronge. Effective teachers for at-risk or highly mobile students? What are the dispositions and behaviours of award-winning teachers? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16(4), 275-291, (2011).

F. Demie, K. Lewis & A. Taplin. Pupil mobility in schools and implications for raising achievement. Educational Studies, 31(2), 131-147, (2005).

J. Moore. Research summary: Resilience and at-risk children and youth. Retrieved from the National Center for Homeless Education Web site: http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/resilience.pdf (2013).

B. Berliner. Educating homeless students: Here

D. H. Jonassen. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?(1991).

K. Pendergrass. How to Teach Kids: Learn the Best Teaching Methods and Techniques, (Feb. 13, 2014).

Downloads

Published

2015-12-16

How to Cite

C. Raz, K., & Ebio, F. M. (2015). Mechanisms Employed by Grade 1 Teachers in Handling Pupils with and without Pre-Elementary Education in Biliran Division. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 24(7), 117–133. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/4921

Issue

Section

Articles