Comparison of the Turkish and USA Primary and Secondary School Social Sciences Curriculums in the Context of Economic Literacy

Authors

  • Adem Phd, Bat?kent, Ankara 06500, Turkey

Keywords:

economic literacy, primary and secondary school, social studies, curriculum, content analysis.

Abstract

Economic literacy comprises of having information about economy themes as scarcity, supply and demand, markets, opportunity costs, resources, productivity, economic growth, and systems, etc., giving correct decisions about economy issues and demonstrating correct economy behaviors. Rising interest to improve the levels of economy awareness of individuals has increased the importance of economic literacy. Economic literacy is an issue which concerns all sections of society, thus also primary and secondary school students closely.

In this study, primary and secondary school social science curriculums of United States of America (New York) were compared to Turkish primary and secondary school social sciences curriculum in terms of economic literacy content of the programme. The data were collected through document examination and investigated by means of content analysis. In consequence of primary and secondary school social sciences curriculums examinations; different and similar implementations were detected between programs of two countries in terms of economic literacy context.

References

A. E. Berti and A. S. Bombi. The Child

M. Boyle-Baisse and J. Zevin. Young Citizens of the World: Teaching Elementary Social Studies through Civic Engagement. New York: Routledge, 2009.

A. Bryman. Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

S. Buckles, M. Schug and M. Watts.

J. Byford and W. Russell.

Council for Economic Education. (2010). Voluntary national content standards in economics (revised edition. [On-line]. Available: http://www.councilforeconed.org/resource/voluntary-national-content-standards-in-economics/ [Jan 1, 2016]

B. Dalgaard.

J. Frankel and N. Wallen. How to Design and Evaluate Research In Education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2000.

P. Freire and D. P. Maced. Literacy: Reading the Word & the World. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers, 1987.

S. Golston.

A. Greenspan.

H. W. Hertzberg. Social Studies Reform, 1880

O. R. Holsti.

D. Jenness. Making Sense of Social Studies, New York: Macmillian Publishing, 1990.

P. Joshi.

Jump$tart. (2015). Learning Standards for Social Studies. [On-line]. Available: http://www.jumpstart.org/assets/files/State_Requirements/NY_05- SS_LEARNING_STANDARDS.pdf [Jan 1, 2016]

N. Klein. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2007.

M. L. Kourilsky.

K. Krippendorff. Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, 2003.

J. Laney and M. Schug.

J. Maxwell.

Milli E?itim Bakanl???. (2015). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi (4., 5., 6., 7. S?n?flar)

J. Morton.

S. Murphy and H. Walsh.

National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). Expectations for excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: NCSS, 1994.

National Council on Economic Education (NCEE). (2008). [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncee.net/ea/standards/ [Jan 1, 2016]

A. Rivlin. (1999). On economic literacy. [On-line]. Available: www.federalreserve.gov/boardDocs/speeches/1999/199905132.htm [Jan 1, 2016]

Y. Rodgers, S. Hawthorne, R. C. Wheeler.

E. W. Ross, S. Mathison, Sandra, & K. D. Vinson.

P. Saunders and J. Gilliard. A Framework for Teaching Basic Economic Concepts, With Scope and Sequence Guidelines, K-12, New York: NCEE, 1995.

M. Schug & C. Birkey.

M. Schug and W. Walstad.

M. C. Schug.

M. C. Schug.

M. C. Schug & E. Hagedorn.

M. C. Schug & N. Lephardt.

L. Senesh. Our working world. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1964.

W. B. Stanley & J. Nelson.

R. Suskind. A hope in the unseen: An American odyssey from the inner city to the Ivy League. New York: Broadway Books, 2005.

P. VanFossen.

P. VanFossen.

A. Yildirim & H. ?im?ek. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Ara?t?rma Y

Downloads

Published

2016-03-14

How to Cite

Adem. (2016). Comparison of the Turkish and USA Primary and Secondary School Social Sciences Curriculums in the Context of Economic Literacy. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 25(3), 272–289. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/3629

Issue

Section

Articles