Influence of Farmer FFS Approach on the Acquisition of Knowledge, Skills for Agricultural Productivity in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya

Authors

  • Walter Akuno
  • C. Onyango
  • J. Obara

Keywords:

Extension approach, Farmer Field Schools, knowledge and skills.

Abstract

The role of agricultural extension is vital to the diffusion of new technologies, but extension is currently not very effective in many African nations, with traditional extension approaches having minimal impact. In Kenya, there have been gaps on the availability of studies and documentation of the specific extension approaches and their influence on the acquisition of knowledge, skills and productivity for household food security despite the various extension efforts and resources put in place in many parts of the country. This study therefore investigated the influence of Farmer Field Schools extension approaches on the acquisition of knowledge, skills and productivity for household food security in the Lake Victoria region, Kenya. The main objective of the study was to compare the influence of Farmer Field Schools and Conventional extension on the acquisition of knowledge, skills and farm productivity for enhanced household security in the Lake Victoria region of Kenya. A cross sectional survey design was adopted in order to develop a detailed account of the effect of the three approaches. The total population of the study area was 188,661 households from which a random sample of 236 was selected comprising of small-scale farmers from three sub counties: Bondo, Rachuonyo and Nyamira.

Data was analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 18.0) at 5 percent level of significance.

Findings revealed that Farmer Field School contributed to the acquisition of knowledge and skills in various agricultural production activities and an increase in farm productivity. Results on On-Farm Research revealed that it contributed more in the acquisition of knowledge and skills as well as improvement of farm productivity as compared to Conventional Extension. Furthermore a hypothesis test showed a significant difference between the two approaches. It is hoped that the findings of this study will contribute to greater understanding of agricultural extension approaches especially in policy formulation and design of the provision of extension services to communities in Kenya.

References

J.K. Kibet, M.E. Omunyinyi, M. E. & J. Muchiri . Elements of Agricultural Extension Policy in

Kenya. Challenges and Opportunities. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings. 7: 1491 - 1494.2005.

A.Haines & A.Cassels. Can The Millennium Development Goals Be Attained? BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 329, No. 7462 (Aug. 14, 2004), pp. 394-397.2004.

C.Thirtle . Producer Funding of R&D: Productivity and the Returns to R&D in British Sugar, 1954-93, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.50, No.3.2001.

D.L.Purcell & J.R. Anderson. Agricultural Extension and Research: Achievements and Problems in National Systems, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.1997.

D.Duveskog . Theoretical perspectives of the learning process in farmer field schools. Nairobi: FAO Working Paper .2006.

World Bank. World Development Report: Agriculture for Development (World Bank, Washington, DC,). 2008.

C. Leeuwis . Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell.2004.

A.Braun, J.Jiggins, N. Ro

A.C. Rola, J.B. Quizon, & S.B. Jamias. Do farmer field school graduates retain what they learn? An investigation in Iloilo, Philippines. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 9(1), 65

K.Davis, E. Nkonya, E.Kato, D.A. Mekonnen, M. Odendo, R. Miiro. Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa. World Development, 40(2), 402

Ministry of Agriculture. Supplement on Managing Food and Nutrition Security. Kilimo House Nairobi Kenya .2009.

Central Bureau of Statistics . Statistical Abstract 2004. Ministry of Finance and Planning. Government Printers, Nairobi.2004.

GoK . Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural Sector Development Strategy 2010-2020. Government Printers, Nairobi, Kenya.2010.

R. Joetzold, H. Schmidt, H. Brethold, & C. Shisanya, C. (2006). Farm Management hand Book of Kenya, Vol II: Part B. Rassdorf, Nairobi.

FAO . Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). www.fao.org.2006

Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries Development. NALEP Operational Manual, Kilimo House Nairobi.2004.

GoK. (1998). Situation Analysis of children and women in Kenya. Ministry of Planning and National development. Nairobi, Kenya.1998.

R.E. Evenson & G. Mwabu G. The effects of agricultural extension on farm yields in Kenya. Discussion Paper No. 708. Yale University, Economic Growth Center, New Haven, Connecticut.1998

World Bank. Agriculture development source book: Agriculture and rural development. Washington DC: World Bank publication.2004.

D. Benor, & Baxter, M. Training and visit extension. The World Bank, Washington DC: USA.1984.

J. Morris. Extension Alternatives in Tropical Africa. Overseas Development Institute: London.1991.

V. Venkatesan. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, Winter, Vol. 9, Number 4.1997.

M. Gautam & J.R. Anderson . Reconsidering the evidence on returns to T&V extension in Kenya. Policy Research Working Paper 1098, the World Bank, Washington D.C. 1999.

GoK. National Development Plan1994- Ministry of Finance and Planning,

Government Printer, Nairobi. Kenya.2004a.

GoK. . Review of the National Agricultural Extension Policy (NEAP) and its Implementation. Volume II

S. Chamala & P.D. Mortiss, P. D. Working together for Landcare: Group management skills and strategies, p. 368. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.1990.

J. R. Anderson . Agricultural Advisory Services. Background Paper for the World Development Report, 2007.

M. Romani. The impact of extension services in times of crisis: C

A.Braun, J. Jiggins, , N. Ro

K. Davis, & N. Place. Non-governmental organizations as an Important Actor in Agricultural Extension in Semiarid East Africa. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 10(1),31

B.A.M Mweri & S.G. Khisa, S.G. Report of the training of trainers course On- Farmer Field School methodology for soil management and legume research Network Project held at Egerton University, March 12-17, 2001. Published by, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya. Pp 13.2001.

A.Abate &, D. Duveskog Applications of the Farmer Field School Approach in Kenya, A Report of The Farmer Field School Stakeholders forum Held on 27th March 2003 At ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya, 2003. Pp. 11-15.

P. Kenmore. Integrated pest management in rice. In: Persley, G.(Ed.), Biotechnology and Integrated Pest Management. CAB International,Wallingford, pp. 76

Van de Fliert, E. (1993). Integrated pest management: Farmer field schools generate sustainable practices. A case study in central Java evaluating IPM training. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningingen.

Feder, G., Murgai, R., & Quizon, J. (2004a). Sending farmers back to school: The impact of farmer field schools in Indonesia. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(1), 45

J.R. Fraenkel, J.R. & N.E. Wallen, N.E. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education: New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Publishers Co. Pp 2-483.2000.

O. Mugenda & A.G. Mugenda, A.G. Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approach, African Centre for Technology Studies, Nairobi, Kenya.1999.

V. H.Borg & Gall, M.E. . Education Research: An Introduction, Pp 257-265). New York, NY:Longman. Inc. 2003.

UNEP (2006a). Lake Victoria Environment Outlook: Environment and Development. UNEP,Nairobi, Kenya.

GoK . Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS, 2008/2009). Ministry of Health, Nairobi: Government Printer.2009.

I.N. Ngathou,J.O. Bukenya, D.M. Chembezi. Information sources preferred by limited resource farmers in using agricultural risk tools. Southern Agricultural Economics Association

G. Feder, R. Murgai, & J. Quizon . Sending farmers back to school: The impact of farmer field schools in Indonesia. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2004a .26(1), 45

F. Mancini.Impact of IPM farmer field schools on the environment, health and livelihood of cot-ton growers in southern India.Doctoral thesis, Biological Farming Systems Group, Wageningen University, The Netherland.2006.

G. Mbagaya, M. Odhiambo & R. Oniango. .Dairy production: A nutrition intervention in a sugarcane growing are in Western Kenya. African Journal of Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. Volume 4 No1 2004.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-25

How to Cite

Akuno, W., Onyango, C., & Obara, J. (2014). Influence of Farmer FFS Approach on the Acquisition of Knowledge, Skills for Agricultural Productivity in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 18(1), 162–180. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/2656

Issue

Section

Articles