Systematic Literature Review on Landscape Design Education and Innovative Creative Thinking

Authors

  • Zheng Fan Malaysia University of Science and Technology (MUST),Block B, Encorp Strand Garden Office, No. 12, Jalan PJU 5/5, Kota Damansara, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Janaka Low Chee Kang Malaysia University of Science and Technology (MUST),Block B, Encorp Strand Garden Office, No. 12, Jalan PJU 5/5, Kota Damansara, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Keywords:

Landscape Design Education, Creative Thinking, Globalization and Art Education, Student Motivation, Self-Concept in Learning

Abstract

This systematic literature review explores the evolving landscape of environmental and landscape art design education in the face of globalization, with a focus on the integration of innovative creative thinking within the educational frameworks of the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. The review examines how global technological advances, cultural exchanges, and socio-economic shifts are compelling art education to transcend traditional paradigms, advocating for curricular reforms that nurture creativity and innovation. Central to this discourse is the role of motivation and self-concept in enhancing students' creative thinking and learning experiences. Drawing on seminal theories such as Self-Determination Theory, Expectancy-Value Theory, the ARCS model of motivation, Pace's Quality of Students’ Effort Theory, and Self-Concept Theory, the review delineates the multifaceted influences on student engagement and creativity in art education. Through a structured methodological approach, this review synthesizes findings from a diverse array of sources to construct a comprehensive perspective on the current state and future directions of landscape design education. The synthesis underscores the need for educational environments that foster intrinsic motivation, build self-efficacy, and cultivate positive self-concepts to empower students to reach their creative potential. This review contributes valuable insights into pedagogical strategies conducive to fostering innovative thinkers, poised to navigate and address the complex challenges of contemporary environmental and landscape design.

References

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.

Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.

Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The philosophical roots of Western and Eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26(1-2), 18-38.

Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2020). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-13.

Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. R&L Education.

Zhang, Y., & Gu, P. (2022). Challenges and strategies in the integration of environmental and landscape art education in Chinese HEIs. Journal of Art and Design Education, 41(1), 22-35.

Zhao, Y. (2010). Preparing globally competent teachers: A new imperative for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 422-431.

Azilio?lu, K., & Y?lmaz, M. (2021). Toplumsal ve kültürel de?i?imlerin sanat e?itimine yans?malar?. E?itim ve Toplum Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi.

Gao, J., Lai, W., & Huang, X. (2021). Research on the cultivation of applied innovative talents in art design under the background of new liberal arts construction based on Cocos digital technology. E3S Web of Conferences.

Kayahan, Z., & Çevik, N. (2020). Disiplinleraras? atölye çal??malar?na bir örnek: Bask?resim-seramik yak?nla?malar?. Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü Dergisi.

Kowalewski, M. (2019). Two perspectives on modern art education – Between marginalization and globalization. Zeszyty Naukowe Wy?szej Szko?y Humanitas w Sosnowcu.

Ma, Y. (2020). History as a mirror: Research on the development of contemporary Chinese art colleges.

Padalka, G., & Zaytseva, A. (2020). Culturological dimensions of projective modeling of art education. Almanac "Culture and Contemporaneity".

Salam, S. (2020). Promoting cultural identity through arts education: The Indonesian context.

Wang, L. (2020). Discussion on the teaching strategy of oil painting in colleges under the background of multiple art culture development. Lethaia.

Yongseok, S. (2021). Art as the content and the method of education: Oakeshot on art education. Philosophy of Education Archive.

Fan, R. (2021). International accreditation of digital media art undergraduate program based on the UK higher education quality standards. The Sixth International Conference on Information.

Nguyen, T., Duncan, R. J., & Bailey, D. H. (2019). Theoretical and methodological implications of associations between executive function and mathematics in early childhood. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3.

Cohen, A. (2019). Israel’s civic education wars: A review of the literature and theoretical implications. Educational Review, 3.

Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Predicting trust in online advertising with an SEM-artificial neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 3.

Greve, T., & Rocha, M. (2020). Policy and theoretical implications of the zero-subsidy bids in the German offshore wind tenders. The Energy Journal, 3.

Pratiwi, N. L. G. D. A., & Budiasih, I. G. A. N. (2020). Pengendalian internal, budaya organisasi, dan kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi di LPD Kabupaten Tabanan. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2020.

Mahdi, O. R., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). The business model of sustainable competitive advantage through strategic leadership capabilities and knowledge management processes to overcome COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 3.

Zhou, Q., Du, Z., Liu, J., Liang, J., & Jiao, Y. (2021). Factors influencing green ship recycling: A conceptual framework and modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021.

Zhu, W., & Dong, S. (2021). Exoplanet statistics and theoretical implications. arXiv:astro-ph.EP, 3.

Lin, S., Shimazu, N., & Sidaway, J. (2021). Theorising from the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 3.

Puntillo, P. (2022). Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 3.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-23

How to Cite

Zheng Fan, & Janaka Low Chee Kang. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Landscape Design Education and Innovative Creative Thinking. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 73(1), 249–258. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/16705

Issue

Section

Articles