Road Performance Relationship Analysis Using PCI and IRI Method on Tukum East Ring Road

Authors

  • Nillam Yahaya Azhary Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • Anik Ratnaningsih Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • abdur Rohman Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Jember 68121, Indonesia

Keywords:

road, road damage, Pavement Condition Index (PCI), International Roughness Index (IRI), relationships

Abstract

The road performance management system in pavement maintenance is based on the existing condition of the road, both functionally and structurally. Various road performance indices were developed to determine the quality of asphalt pavement and road maintenance strategies, such as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and International Roughness Index (IRI) methods which provide an assessment of road performance conditions in terms of damage and roughness. The main objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between road performance using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and the International Roughness Index (IRI). Based on the results of the two methods, the researcher processed the data by developing linear and non-linear regression models to obtain the best relationship model for the East Ring Line of Lumajang Regency. The data shows that on the Lumajang Regency East Ring Road, the average PCI value is 26.76 with the poor category, the IRI value is 7.92 with the poor category. One of the sections on the East Ring Road section, namely the JLT Tukum section with a segment length of 5.000 m, has a PCI value of 49 which is included in the poor category and the IRI value for the JLT Tukum section is 5.6 which is included in the fair category. Based on the analysis results, the best model for the Tukum East Ring Road is a non-linear exponential regression model with the equation IRI = 200 (1 – 0.02)PCI and a value of R2 = 0.94.

References

H. Pérez-Acebo, A. Linares-Unamunzaga, E. Rojí, and H. Gonzalo-Orden, “IRI performance models for flexible pavements in two-lane roads until first maintenance and/or rehabilitation work,” Coatings, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.3390/coatings10020097.

A. Issa, H. Samaneh, and M. Ghanim, “Predicting pavement condition index using artificial neural networks approach,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 101490, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.033.

S. Adeli, V. Najafi Moghaddam Gilani, M. Kashani Novin, E. Motesharei, and R. Salehfard, “Development of a Relationship between Pavement Condition Index and International Roughness Index in Rural Road Network,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6635820.

A. A. Elhadidy, S. M. El-Badawy, and E. E. Elbeltagi, “A simplified pavement condition index regression model for pavement evaluation,” Int. J. Pavement Eng., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 643–652, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10298436.2019.1633579.

L. O. Kalengkongan, J. E. Waani, and S. Y. R. Rompis, “Model Hubungan Antara Ketidakrataan Permukaan Jalan dengan Nilai Kerusakan Permukaan Jalan Pada Ruas Jalan Nasional di Kota Manado (Stusi Kasus?: Ruas Jalan Batas Kota Manado - Tomon dan Jalan Mongosidi),” J. Ilm. Media Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jime/article/view/36668.

A. Sharma, S. N. Sachdeva, and P. Aggarwal, “Predicting IRI Using Machine Learning Techniques,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 128–137, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42947-021-00119-w.

O. G. Dela Cruz, C. A. Mendoza, and K. D. Lopez, “International Roughness Index as Road Performance Indicator: A Literature Review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 822, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/822/1/012016.

S. A. Dewan and R. E. Smith, “Valuing Pavement Network Assets and Use of Values as Decision Supports,” J. Infrastruct. Syst., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 202–210, 2005, doi: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:4(202).

J. A. Mactutis, S. H. Alavi, and W. C. Ott, “Investigation of relationship between roughness and pavement surface distress based on WesTrack project,” Transp. Res. Rec., no. 1699, pp. 107–113, 2000, doi: 10.3141/1699-15.

A. K. Sandra and A. K. Sarkar, “Development of a model for estimating International Roughness Index from pavement distresses,” Int. J. Pavement Eng., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 715–724, 2013, doi: 10.1080/10298436.2012.703322.

R. Imam, Y. Murad, I. Asi, and A. Shatnawi, “Predicting Pavement Condition Index from International Roughness Index using Gene Expression Programming,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s41062-021-00504-1.

H. Amelia Setiaputri, M. Isradi, A. Irfan Rifai, A. Mufhidin, and J. Prasetijo, “Analysis Of Urban Road Damage With Pavement Condition Index (PCI) And Surface Distress Index (SDI) Methods,” ADRI Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 01, pp. 10–19, 2021, doi: 10.29138/ijset.v6i01.61.

Paikun, E. Suminar, A. Irawan, and S. Bahri, “DETERMINING ROAD HANDLING ACCORDING TO THE LEVEL OF DAMAGE USING SURFACE DISTRESS INDEX (SDI) METHOD (Case study on Jl. Merdeka 1 Sukabumi City),” ASTONJADRO J. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135–149, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://150.107.142.43/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/5471/0.

M. F. Romadhon, D. A. Susanto, S. Anugrahamdani, and R. R. Sunhadji, “Analisis kondisi kerusakan jalan pada ruas jalan Kadudampit dengan metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI),” J. TESLINK Tek. Sipil dan Lingkung., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–94, 2021, doi: 10.52005/teslink.v3i2.77.

M. A. Rahman, H. Arifin, and B. O. Sowolino, “Perbandingan Metode International Roughness Index Dengan Pavement Condition Index Untuk Penentuan Kondisi Jalan Nasional Di Kota Wamena (Studi Kasus?: Ruas Jalan Wamena – Habema),” Rang Tek. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.31869/rtj.v5i1.2702.

D. A. Azhar, B. Prasetyo, and A. Budiharjo, “Analisis Hubungan Pavement Condition Index (PCI) dan Surface Distress Index (SDI) Dengan International Roughness Index (IRI),” 2019, [Online]. Available: http://repository.untad.ac.id/2454/.

R. Kurniawan, Analisis Regresi. Prenada Media, 2016.

L. M. Samryn, “Perbandingan Pengaruh Arus Kas dari Aktivitas Investasi terhadap Rasio Kecukupan Modal Bank Umum Indonesia dan Malaysia,” J. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 2022.

A. E. Syahputra, Y. Fanani, and S. H. Yuwanto, “Estimasi Sumberdaya dan Cadangan Dengan Metode Ordinary Kriging pada Blok Eksplorasi Cahaya Prima Kausa di PT. Cinta Jaya (Gasing Grub) Desa Tapunggaya, Kecamatan Molawe, Kabupaten Konawe Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara,” J. Geol. Sriwij., vol. 2, 2022.

F. Hafiz et al., “Model Lapisan Geologi Teknik Permukaan Menggunakan Metode Gelombang Geser di Kecamatan Darul Imarah Aceh Besar,” vol. 4, pp. 260–266, 2022.

F. A. Chaidir and N. Dewanti, “ANALISA PERBANDINGAN DATA PASANG SURUT DENGAN METODE KOEFISIEN KORELASI DAN RMSE ANTARA DATA IOC - SEALEVELMONITORING DAN DATA PROGRAM NAOTIDE,” no. November, pp. 36–41, 2022.

A. A. Suryanto, “Penerapan Metode Mean Absolute Error (Mea) Dalam Algoritma Regresi Linear Untuk Prediksi Produksi Padi,” Saintekbu, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2019, doi: 10.32764/saintekbu.v11i1.298.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-08

How to Cite

Yahaya Azhary, N., Ratnaningsih, A., & Rohman, abdur. (2023). Road Performance Relationship Analysis Using PCI and IRI Method on Tukum East Ring Road. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 69(1), 112–123. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/15890

Issue

Section

Articles