Exploring Theories of Equivalence: A Critical Review

  • Hicham Beddari ‘‘Ibn Zohr’’ University-BP 29/S 80000 Agadir-Morocco
Keywords: Equivalence, translation, translator, translation theories, source language (SL), target language (TL)

Abstract

The notion of equivalence is one of the most important issues in translation studies that scholars and translation theorists examined in the 1960s and 1970s. Since then, it has been an issue of considerable controversy owing to the multiplicity of opinions, interpretations and definitions of the concept under discussion. A plethora of theories of equivalence, hence,  came to the forefront and scholars’ work, in this regard, has been categorized into three major groups: 1) linguistically-oriented approaches to translation, 2) culturally-oriented approaches to translation, 3) a combination of the two approaches. The present paper ostensibly aims to delve into the most pivotal theories of equivalence, in a critical fashion, that have been presented by translation scholars and theorists starting from Vinay and  Darbelnet (1958) through Anthony Pym (2010), eventually. These theories cast considerable light on how the concept of equivalence has evolved over time. Despite the divergent views with regards to the concept in focus, it is still being used in translation literature up to the present time.

References

. J. Munday. Introducing Translation Studies Theories and Applicaions (4th ed). London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

. V. Leonardi. The Role of Pedagogical Translation in Second Language Acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang, 2010.

. M. Shuttleworth & M. Cowie. Dictionary of Translation Studies. Manchester: St Jerome. 1997.

. [J.P. Vinay and J. Darbelnet. Stylistique Comparée du Francais et de l' Anglais: Méthode de Traduction. Paris: Didier. (Transl. and ed. by Sager, J.C. and Hamel, M.J. (1995) as Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins. 1958.

. R. Jakobson. On Linguistic Aspects of Translation, Achilles Fang et al. On Translation, 232–239. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1959.

. J. Munday. Introducing Translation Studies Theories and Applicaions (2nd ed). London and New York: Routledge, 2001.

. E. Nida. Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1964.

. E. Nida and C.R. Taber. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1969.

. S. Shakernia. ‘‘Study of Nida’s (formal and dynamic equivalence) and Newmark’s (semantic and communicative translation) Translating Theories on Two Short Stories’’. Merit Research Journal of Education and Review, Vol. 2(1), pp. 01-07. 2013.

. G.Edwin. ‘‘Contemporary Translation Theories.’’ PhD dissertation, University of Vanderbilt, USA, 1990.

. J. C. Catford. A linguistic theory of translation: An essay on applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.

. J. House. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and present. Lonon and New York: Routledge, 2015.

. P. Newmark. Approaches to Translation. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1981.

. [M. Baker. In Other Words. A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge, 1992.

. A. Pym. Exploring Translation Theories. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

. A. Pym. (2007, December). ‘‘Natural and Directional Equivalence in Theories of Translation’’. [On-line]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39730148 [July 16, 2003].

Published
2021-09-04
Section
Articles