Teaching Strategies Utilized by Mathematics Teachers in the 21st-Century

  • Jonathan Campilla Calegu Integrated School, Catablan, Urdaneta City 2428, Philippines
  • Vener Abiett Castañaga Urdaneta City University, San Vicente West, Urdaneta City 2428, Philippines
Keywords: Teaching strategies, multimedia-based, manipulative-based, game-based, contextual learning strategy


Due to the increasing demands of the twenty-first century work environment, education system must reflect those skills essential for success. Through the development of the 21st-century standards for teachers and students, the Philippines education system has begun the reform process to initiate change towards addressing these new skills. It is through the introduction of various strategies and innovative materials in the teaching-learning process aligned with the development of the 21st-century skills. This study dealt with the teaching strategies utilized by mathematics teachers in the 21st-century in the Schools Division of Urdaneta City during the S.Y. 2019-2020. A total of one hundred two (102) secondary mathematics teachers of the SDO Urdaneta City served as the respondents. Data were obtained using a researcher-designed questionnaire checklist which was validated by experts in the field. Results showed that the least utilized 21st-century teaching strategy by the mathematics teachers is multimedia-based. Thus, a gamified PowerPoint presentation to support the application of multimedia-based strategy was developed. Interestingly, this study found significant differences in the extent of utilization of the teaching strategies by mathematics teachers across sex and type of school. Moreover, findings revealed that significant relationships exist between the extent of utilization of the teaching strategies by mathematics teachers and the profile variables age, sex, relevant training at the national level, and type of school. It was recommended that Mathematics teachers should be encouraged to utilize the gamified PowerPoint template to supplement the teaching-learning process in Mathematics.


. A. Rosen. “A technology revolution isn't coming to classrooms, it's here”. Internet: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-rosen/atechnology-revolution-is-here_b_9857182.html, May 10, 2017 [Jan. 29, 2020].

. The Partnership for 21st-Century Learning. (2015, May 15). P21 framework definitions. Partnership for 21st-century Learning.

. H. Soulé & T. Warrick. (2015, May). “Defining 21st-century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. [Online]. 9(2), pp. 178–186. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000017 [Jan. 29, 2020].

. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. 2000.

. M. Santos, R. Diaz, & R. Belecina. (2015, Dec.). “Mathematical modeling: effects on problem solving performance and math anxiety of students”. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences. [Online]. Vol. 65, pp 103-115 Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/176506/ [Jan. 29, 2020].

. V. Alkan. (2013). “Reducing mathematics anxiety: The ways implemented by teachers at primary schools”. International J. Soc. Sci. & Education. [Online]. 3, 3, pp. 795 – 807. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598328.pdf [Jan. 31, 2020].

. I. Culaste. (2011). “Cognitive skills of mathematical problem solving of grade 6 children.” International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research. [Online]. 1, pp, 120 – 125. Available: https://www.auamii.com/jiir/Vol-01/issue-01/X12.Culaste.pdf [Feb 2, 2020].

. S. Crisostomo. “Filipino students still rate low in math, science”, Philippine Star. December 10, 2000. [Online]. Available. ttps://www.philstar.com/other-sections/news-commentary/2000/12/10/91528/filipino-students-still-rate-low-math-science[Feb. 1, 2020].

. R. San Juan. “DepEd welcomes PISA results, recognizes 'gaps' in education quality”, Philippine Star. December 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.philstar. com/headlines/2019/12/04/1974229/deped-welcomes-pisa-results-recognizes-gaps-education-quality [Jan. 28, 2020].

. A. Rysdon (2010). “Math students can relate to.” Available: https://www.chatham.edu/pti/curriculum/units/2010/2/Rysdon.pdf.

. N. Moore. “Alternative strategies for teaching mathematics”. Education and Human Development Master's Theses.130. 2012. Available: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/130. [Feb. 2, 2020].

. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). “The twenty-first century mathematics classroom.” https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher/Blog/TheTwentyFirst-Century-Mathematics-Classroom/# [Jan. 27, 2020].

. M. Chapko, & M. Buchko. “Math instruction for inquiring minds.” Principal (Reston, Va.), 84, 30-33. Nov-Dec 2004.

. L. O'neal, P. Gibson, & S. Cotton. (2017, Jul.). “Elementary school teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning.” Computers in the Schools. [Online]. 34(3), pp. 192-206. Available: 10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443 [Feb. 11, 2020].

. O. Akinoso (2018, May). “Effect of the use of multimedia on students’ performance in secondary school mathematics.” Global Media Journal 2018. [Online]. 16:30. Available: https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/effect-of-the-use-of-multimedia-on-students-performance-in-secondary-school-mathematics.pdf [Feb. 11, 2020].

. S. Musti-roa, G. Cartledge, J. Bennett, & M. Council, (2015, Mar). “Literacy instruction using technology with primary-age culturally and linguistically diverse students.” Intervention in School and Clinic. [Online]. 50(4), pp. 195-202. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214546404[Feb. 9, 2020].

. T. Lach, & L. Sakshaug. “Let’s do math: Wanna play?.” Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 11 (4), pp. 172-176, Nov. 2005.

. N. Gallenstein. “Engaging young children in science and mathematics.” Journal of Elementary Science Education, vol. 17 (2), pp. 27-41, Fall 2005.

. L. Annetta, M. Cheng, & S. Holmes, (2010, May). “Assessing twenty‐first century skills through a teacher created video game for high school biology students.” Research in Science & Technological Education. [Online]. 28:2, 101-114, Available: DOI: 10.1080/02635141003748358 [Feb. 2, 2020].

. F. Paraskeva, S. Mysirlaki, & A. Papagianni. (2010, Feb.). “Multiplayer online games as educational tools: Facing new challenges in learning.” Computers & Education. [Online]. 54, pp. 498-505. Available: doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.001 [Feb. 2, 2020].

. K. Kiili (2005, Mar). “Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model.” The Internet and Higher Education. [Online]. 8. 13-24. Available: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001 [Feb. 3, 2020].

. K. Tan (2007, Feb). “Comparing games and case methods in enhancing student learning.” International Journal of Innovation and Learning. [Online]. 4, pp. 224–236. Available: 10.1504/IJIL.2007.012379 [Feb. 2, 2020].

. K. Tan, Y. Tse, &, P. Chung (2010, Aug). “A plug and play pathway approach for operations management games development.” Computers & Education. [Online]. 55, pp. 109–117. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.008 [Feb. 3, 2020].

. J. Gosen, & J. Washbush. (2004, Jun). “A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness.” Simulation and Gaming. [Online]. 35, pp. 270–293. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111116/ [Feb. 5, 2020].

. L. Proserpio, & D. Gioia. “Teaching the virtual generation.” Academy of Management Learning and Education. 6(1), pp. 69–80. Mar. 2007.

. K. Zantow, D. Knowlton, & D. Sharp. (2005, Dec.). “More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations.” Academy of Management Learning & Education. [Online]. 4, pp. 451–458. Available: DOI:10.5465/AMLE.2005.19086786 [Feb. 5, 2020].

. G. Thompson, & P. Dass. (2000, Mar.). “Improving students’ self-efficacy in strategic management: The relative impact of cases and simulations. Simulation and Gaming. [Online]. 31(1), pp. 22–41. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/104687810003100102 [Feb. 9, 2020].

. M. Prensky. Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House. 2007.

. M. Khine & I. Saleh. (2009, Aug). “Gameplay habits among middle school students: A descriptive study.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems. [Online]. 34, pp. 431– 440. Available: https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.37.4.g [Feb. 3, 2020].

. J. Kirriemuir, & A. Mcfarlane. Literature review in games and learning. Bristol, UK: Futurelab. 2004.

. R. Rosas, M. Nussbaum, P. Cumsille, V. Marianov, M. Correa, P. Flores, V. Grau, F. Lagos, X. López, V. López, P. Rodríguez, & M. Salinas (2003). “Beyond Nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for the first and second grade students.” Computers and Education. [Online]. 40, pp. 71–94. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00099-4 [Jan. 28, 2020].

. L. Bragg. “Students` impressions of the value of games for the learning of mathematics”, in Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Cape Town, South Africa, 2006, pp. 217-224.

. S. Nisbet & A. Williams. “Improving students’ attitudes to chance with games and activities.” Australian Mathematics Teacher. [Online]. 65 (3), pp. 25-37. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ859754.pdf [Feb. 3, 2020].

. F. Ke & B. Grabowski. (2007). “Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not?.” British Journal of Education Technology. [Online]. 38 (2), pp. 249-259. Available: doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00593.x [Feb. 2, 2020].

. A. Jacobs & J. Kohl. (2007, Jan.). “Fun and games.” Teaching Pre K-8. [Online]. 37 (4), pp. 54-55. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ762714 [Feb. 2, 2020].

. J. Trawick-Smith, S. Swaminathan & X. LIU (2016). “The relationship of teacher-child play interactions to mathematics learning in preschool.” Early Child Development and Care. [Online]. 186(5), pp. 716-733. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1054818 [Feb. 7, 2020].

. F. Ke. (2008, Sep.). “Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. [Online]. 3(4), pp. 429-445. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2 [Feb. 7, 2020].

. A. Marcus, B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Macdonald. “Children noticing their own and others' mathematics in play,” in Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2016, pp. 439-446.

. B. Brandth. (2013, Jun.). “Everyday pedagogical practices in mathematical play situations in German “kindergarten”.” Educational Studies in Mathematics. [Online]. 84(2), pp. 227-248. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9490-6 [Feb. 8, 2020].

. J. Bellamy, & J. Mativo (2010, Apr.). “A different angle for teaching math.” Technology Teacher. [Online]. 69(7), pp. 26-28. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ887813 [Feb. 11, 2020].

. E. Afari, J. Aldridge, B. Fraser, & M. Khine. (2013, Apr.). “Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms.” Learning Environments Research. [Online]. 16(1), pp. 131-150. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9122-6 [Feb. 6, 2020].

. E. Bouck, & S. Flanagan, (2010). “Virtual manipulatives: What they are and how teachers can use them.” Intervention in School and Clinic. [Online]. 45 (3), pp. 186-191. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451209349530 [Feb. 11, 2020].

. C. Chevalier, M. Pippen, & D. Stevens. (2008, Nov.). “MIM: Math in motion for K-2.” Teaching Children Mathematics. [Online]. 15 (4), pp. 196-200. Available: https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.15.4.0196 [Jan. 28, 2020].

. W. Rapp. (2009, Dec). “Avoiding math taboos: Effective math strategies for visual-spatial students.” Teaching Exceptional Children Plus. [Online]. 6 (2), pp. 121-135. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ875427.pdf [Feb. 8, 2020].

. L. Puchner, A. Taylor, & B. O’donnell, & K. Fick. (2008). “Teacher learning and mathematics manipulatives: A collective case study about teacher use of manipulatives in elementary and middle school mathematics lessons.” School Science and Mathematics. [Online]. 108 (7), pp. 313-325. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17844.x [Feb. 10, 2020].

. Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2008). “Exploring the use of mathematics manipulative materials: is it what we think it is?,” in the Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 International Conference. Sustainability in Higher Education: Directions for Change, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia, 2008, pp.19-21.

. N. Nool. “Effectiveness of an Improvised Abacus in Teaching Addition of Integers,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Management Innovation, 2012, pp. 307-311.

. V. Farren (2008). “A reflection on my teaching practices using students’ math moments.” College Quarterly. [Online]. 11 (4), pp. 74-81. Available: http://collegequarterly.ca/2008-vol11-num04-fall/farren.html [Feb. 9, 2020].

. H. Peterson. “Adding Gamification To Your Presentation.” Info.optiontechnologies.com. https://info.optiontechnologies.com/option-technologies-interactive-blog/option-technologies-interactive-blog/bid/205335/adding-gamification-to-your-presentation, 2021. [Jan 3, 2021].