Internal Qualiy Assurance of Higher Education Using a Soft Systems Methodology Approach

Authors

  • Sulartopo Sulartopo Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Jl: Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia
  • Daniel Manongga Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Information Technologyy, Satya Wacana Christian University, Jl: Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia
  • Albert Nugraha Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Jl: Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia

Keywords:

Accountability, University, Higher Education Institutions, Internal Quality Assurance, Soft Systems Methodology

Abstract

Higher education in Indonesia is under pressure from various parties. Apart from the government, strong pressure came from stakeholders. In the midst of this situation, higher education increasingly resembles a business operation, where competition is a key factor. With the increasing cost of higher education, various parties demand the need for accountability for higher education. The higher education accounting system is a consequence of the marketization of the university. Higher education accountability aims to ensure the quality of education in fulfilling all Quality Assurance standards required in the National Quality Assurance Framework for Higher Education. From the results of the evaluation by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education in 2018, it shows that 46% of universities in Indonesia do not have data / output evidence of the implementation of internal quality assurance and this has always been a problem from year to year. This article aims to conduct a reflective review of the internal quality assurance system applied in higher education in Indonesia. This study used the Soft Systems Methodology approach by conducting case studies, that is by comparing two internal quality assurance systems in two different universities. College A is a university that has the accreditation status of institution A (Very Good), while college B is a university that has received the accreditation status of institution C (Sufficient). This study shows how the SSM method can be used by universities for comprehensive evaluation and improvement of the university's internal quality assurance system. The results of this study are a conceptual model of internal quality assurance and recommendations for improvement of the existing system.

References

. Ł. Sułkowski. (2016, Mar). “Accountability of University: Transition of Public Higher Education”. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. [On-line]. 4(1), pp. 9-21. Available: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040102. [Dec. 5, 2019].

. D.J. Deming and D. Figlio. (2016, Summer). “Accountability in US Education: Applying Lessons from K-12 Experience to Higher Education”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. [On-line]. 30(3), pp. 33-56. Available: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.33. [Feb 10, 2020].

. Hazelkorn E. (2018, Jul). “The Accountability and Transparency Agenda: Emerging Issues in the Global Era. In: Curaj A., Deca L., Pricopie R. (eds) European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies. [On-line]. Springer, Cham. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_26. [Jan 5, 2020].

. Vella M. (2017). Internal Quality Assurance: Step by Step Guide to Internal Quality Assurance. National Commission for Further and Higher Education. [On-line]. Erasmus+. Available: https://ncfhe.gov.mt/en/resources/Documents/Publications/Quality%20Assurance/Step%20by%20step%20 guide%20to%20internal%20quality%20assurance.pdf. [Feb 10, 2020].

. L. Nabaho, W. Turyasingura, A.K. Kiiza, F. Andama and A. Beinebyabo. (2020, Sep). “Quality assurance of higher education governance and management: An exploration of the minimum imperative for the Envisioned African Common Higher Education Space”. Higher Learning Research Communications. [On-line]. 10(2), pp. 38-52. Available: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v10i2.1183. [Feb 14, 2021].

. T.S. Chaparro, V.G. Frías and O.G. Benito. (2019, Dec). “Competitive Implications of Quality Assurance Processes in Higher Education. The Case of Higher Education in Engineering in France”. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. [On-line]. 33(1), pp. 2825-2843. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1697329. [Mar 17, 2020].

. Law No. 20 (2003). National Education System. [On-line]. Available: on https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_isn=84435&p_lang=en. [Feb 10, 2020].

. H. Prabowo, G. Farida and D. Vidayanti. (2017). “Implementing the Quality Assurance System in Indonesian Higher Education”. Actual Problems of Economiics. [On-line]. 11(197). Available: https://doi.org10.13140/RG.2.2.21424.92165. [Feb 11, 2020].

. P.I.D. Kemenristekdikti. (2018). Higher Education Statistical Year Book 2018. [On-line]. Higher Education Database, Jakarta. Available: https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/asset/data/publikasi/Statistik%20 Pendidikan%20Tinggi%20Indonesia%202018.pdf. [Jun 13, 2020].

. A. Mursidi, T.J. Raharjo, Sugiyo and A. Yulianto. (2020). “Factual Model of Internal Quality Assurance System of Private Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia”. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning. [On-line]. 5(1), pp. 46-52. Available: https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v5i1.1926. [Jan 19, 2021].

. A. Noda, S. Kim, A.Y.C. Hou, I-J.G. Lu and H.C. Chou. (2021) “The relationships between internal quality assurance and learning outcome assessments: challenges confronting universities in Japan and Taiwan”. Quality in Higher Education. [On-line]. 27(1), pp. 59-76. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1838406. [May 26, 2021].

. D. Vykydal, M. Folta, J. Nenadál. (2020). “A Study of Quality Assessment in Higher Education within the Context of Sustainable Development: A Case Study from Czech Republic”. Sustainability. [On-line]. 12(11). Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114769. [Jan 19, 2021].

. T.M.H. Le, V.K.L. Nguyen, T.S. Nguyen, T.H.O. Le and T.N.M. Duong. (2021). "Assessment of Students’ Satisfaction of Facility Service Quality in Private Universities". Universal Journal of Educational Research. [On-line]. 9(5), pp. 974-983. Available: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090510. [May 26, 2021].

. S. Andleeb and A. Jusoh. (2020). “Institutional Internal Quality Assurance Assessment Practices and Student Satisfaction”. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight. [On-line]. 3(3), pp. 117-144. Available: https://doi.org/10.31580/JPVAI.v3i3.1647. [May 26, 2021].

. N. Rahnuma. (2020). The Bangladeshi higher education quality assurance framework: a pathway for transformation. Quality in Higher Education. [On-line]. 26(1), pp. 14-31. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1729309. [Jan 19, 2021].

. H. Lucander and C. Christersson. (2020). “Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment”. Quality in Higher Education. [On-line]. 26(2), pp. 135-155. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1761008. [May 26, 2021].

. M. Seyfried and P. Pohlenz. (2018). “Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness”. Quality in Higher Education. [On-line]. 8(3), pp. 258-271. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474777. [May 26, 2021].

. O.A. Khurma, Y.A. Ramamneh, T. Hassell, M.A. Hammadi, S. Zoelfakar and Y. Fairouz. (2020). “Quality Assurance Model in Enhancing the Professional Development Content”. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research. [On-Line]. 54(5), pp. 49-68. Available: https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/12020. [May 26, 2021].

. Elviwani, M. Zarlis, A. Dilham and R. Buaton. (2020). “Higher Education Quality Assurance System Based Artificial Intelligence”. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. [On-line]. 6(6), pp. 274-279. Available: https://doi.org./10.32628/CSEIT206635. [May 26, 2021].

. M.J. Manatos and J. Huisman. (2020). “The use of the European Standards and Guidelines by national accreditation agencies and local review panels”. Journal Quality in Higher Education. [On-line] 26(1). Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1728835. [Jan 19, 2021].

. K.P.J. Lilja. (2017). “Key enabling factors for organizational ambidexterity in the public sector”. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. [On-line]. 9(1). Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038. [Apr 21, 2022].

. A. Kashyap, R. Agrawal and P.K. Ghosh. (2018). “Examining higher educational institutes for better growth of national economy through structured innovation”. Int. J. Innovation in Education. [On-line]. 5(1), pp. 61-78. Available: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2018.093819. [Jan 16, 2020].

. A. Prowse, V.R. Vargas and S. Powell. (2020). “Design Considerations for Personalised Supported Learning: Implications for Higher Education”. Journal of Further and Higher Education. [On-line]. 45(1), pp. 497-510. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1789915. [Jan 19, 2021].

. D. Heathcote, S. Savage and A. Hosseinian-Far. (2020). “Factors Affecting University Choice Behaviour in the UK Higher Education”. Education Sciences. [On-line]. 10(8), pp. 199. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_26. [Jan 19, 2021].

. B.L.M. Morrell, H.N. Eukel and L.E. Santurri. (2020). “Soft skills and implications for future professional practice: Qualitative findings of a nursing education escape room”. Nurse Education Today. [On-line]. 93. Available: htpps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104462. [Jan 19, 2021].

. H. Bernardo, A. Gaspar and C.H. Antune. (2018). “A Combined Value Focused Thinking-Soft Systems Methodology Approach to Structure Decision Support for Energy Performance Assessment of School Buildings”. Sustainability. [On-line]. 10(7), pp. 2295. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072295. [Jan 19, 2020].

. R. Sharma, C. Zhang, S.C. Wingreen, N. Kshetri and A. Zahid. (2019). “Design of Blockchain-based Precision Health-Care Using Soft Systems Methodology”. Industrial Management & Data Systems. [On-line]. 120(3), pp. 608-632. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2019-0401. [Jun 9, 2020].

. N. Nurhasanah, Machfud, D. Mangunwidjaja and M. Romli. (2020). “The Application of Soft System Methodology to Design the Conceptual Model for Intelligent Supply Chain Model of Natural Fibre Agroindustry”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. [On-line]. 847(1). Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/847/1/012089. [Jan 19, 2021].

. P.B. Checkland and J. Scholes. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. [On-line]. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=130360 [Jul 22, 2019].

. B. William. (2005). Soft System Methodology. [On-line]. The Kellogg Foundation. Available: http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf. [Jul 22, 2019].

Downloads

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

Sulartopo, S. ., Manongga, D. ., & Nugraha, A. . (2021). Internal Qualiy Assurance of Higher Education Using a Soft Systems Methodology Approach. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 58(2), 206–223. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/12664

Issue

Section

Articles