Imperatives of Visual and Auditory Perception and their Interpersonal Functions as Discourse Markers in Albanian Conversations

Authors

  • Edona Vinca Mother Teresa University, Mirce Acev, 4, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia

Keywords:

conversation, discourse marker, pragmatics, speech acts, politeness, imperative of visual perception, imperative of auditory perception

Abstract

This paper looks at interpersonal functions of visual and auditory perception imperatives in authentic conversations in Albanian language. Although they belong to the inventory of discourse markers that have received due attention in English scholarship, its equivalents in Albanian, shiko/d?gjo, have remained largely understudied in the context of spoken interaction. Therefore, the existing research on look/listen may serve as a basic framework for contrastive analyses of interpersonal functions of its functional counterparts in other languages. The sample analysis performed through AntConc is discussed within the scope of two theories, that of Speech Acts and that of Politeness and it confirms that the imperatives for visual and auditory perception play a major part in the realization of the illocutionary force of the speech act itself.  The main hypothesis underlying our investigation is that the analyzed markers appear in initial syntactic positions in Face-Threatening Acts (FTA) with the core function of signaling the aim of the illocutionary force of the speech act within which they appear, but also with other functions such as boosting or hedging the illocutionary force. To prove the hypothesis we conduct an analysis using data collected from authentic telephone conversations in Albanian whereby determining face threatening speech acts (speech acts considered as threatening the negative and positive face of the hearer (addressee)).  By discovering interpersonal functions of these widely-used discourse markers in Albanian we can enrich our understanding in conversational pragmatics and observe closely how new developments in communication are inciting changes in the way we interact.

References

. K. Aijmer and A. Elgemark. ‘’The pragmatic markers look and listen in a cross-linguistic perspective’’. Of butterflies and birds, of dialects and genres. 333. 2013

. P. Hopper and E. Traugott. Grammaticalization. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 2003

. R. Waltereit. ‘’Imperatives, interruption in conversation, and the rise of discourse markers: a study of Italian guarda.’’. Linguistics . 987-1010. 2002

. L. Brinton. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. De Gruyter Mouton. 1996

. S. Schwenter and E. Traugott. ‘’Invoking scalarity: The development of in fact.’’ Journal of historical pragmatics 1.1. 7-25. 2000

. E. Traugott, ‘’The role of the development of discourse marker in a theory of grammaticalization.’’ Manchester ichl xii. 1995

. E. Traugott, ‘’The role of the development of discourse marker in a theory of grammaticalization.’’ Manchester ichl xii. Version of 11/97. 1995

. E. Traugott and R. Dasher. ‘’Regularity in semantic change’’. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 2002

. E. Keller and S. Warner. ‘’Gambits: Responders, Closers & Inventory. The Third of Three Modules’’. Quebec, Canada. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services. 1979

. A. Stenstrom. ‘’An Introduction to Spoken Interaction’’. London. Longman. 1994.

. J. Romer-Trillo. ‘’Your attention, please: Pragmatic mechanisms to obtain the addressee’s attention in English and Spanish conversations.’’ Journal of Pragmatics 28.2. 205-221. 1997

. E. Buzarovska ‘’Глаголите за перцепција како прагматички маркери во македонскиот и рускиот јазик’’. Зборник на трудови од V Македонскки-руска конференција. 83-92. 2012

. B. De Clerck. ‘’The Imperative in English: a Corpus-based, Pragmatic Analysis’’. PhD thesis, Ghent University, 2006

. D. Schiffrin. Discourse Markers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1987

. K. Aijmer. Understanding pragmatic markers. Edinburgh University Press. 2013

. B. Fraser. ‘’Types of English discourse markers’’. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38. 19-33. 1988

. Fjalor i gjuhës së sotme shqipe, Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e RPSH- Instituti i Gjuhësisë dhe i Letërsisë. Prishtinë. Rilindja. 1981:1842

. Fjalor i gjuhës së sotme shqipe, Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e RPSH- Instituti i Gjuhësisë dhe i Letërsisë. Prishtinë. Rilindja. 1981:321

. G. Jefferson. ‘’Glossary of transcript symbols.’’ Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. 13-31. 2004

. J. R. Searle. Expression and meaning. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1979

. G. Leech. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. 1983

. P. Brown and S. Levinson. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambrdige. Cambridge University Press. 1987

. E. Goffman. ‘’On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Interactional Rituals: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. 5-45. 1967

. K. Josif. ‘’Pjesëzat si kategori leksikogramatikore në shqipen e sotme’’. SF /3. Tiranë. 1969

. E. Angoni. ‘’Pjesëzat në çështje të fonetikës dhe të gramatikës së shqipes së sotme’’. Tiranë. 1972

. S. Rrokaj. ‘’Pour une typologie des catalyseurs du message. Le cas de l’albanais’’. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 8(1). 2014

. K. Dibra; N. Varfi. Gjuhësi teksti. Tiranë. SHBLU. 2005

. L. Mëniku. ‘’Konektorët e tekstit në gjuhën shqipe’’. PhD dissertation. Universiteti i Tiranës. 2013

. W. Safire. ‘’The way we live now’’. NY Times (13 June, 1999); accessed at https://archive.nytimes.com

Downloads

Published

2021-05-04

How to Cite

Vinca, E. . (2021). Imperatives of Visual and Auditory Perception and their Interpersonal Functions as Discourse Markers in Albanian Conversations. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 57(2), 171–185. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/12592

Issue

Section

Articles