The Importance of Forensic Audit and Differences in Relation to Financial Audit

Authors

  • Katerina Mircheska Faculty of Economics, University “St.Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Marksova 133, Prilep 7500, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Vera Karadjova Faculty of Toursm and Hospitality “St.Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Marksova 133, Ohrid 6000, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Slavica Blazheva Faculty of Economics, University “St.Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Marksova 133, Prilep 7500, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Maja Malakovska Faculty of Economics, University “St.Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Marksova 133, Prilep 7500, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Pece Nikolovski Faculty of Economics, University “St.Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Marksova 133, Prilep 7500, Republic of North Macedonia

Keywords:

forensic audit, forensic accounting, fraud, financial audit

Abstract

Financial statements are one of the most important factors affecting the overall business, in particular investment decision making. External audit aims to determine accuracy and objectivity of financial statements, i.e., disclosure of funds, resources and business performances in the financial statements, and to form an opinion based on the information provided. Therefore, the purpose of external traditional audit is not fraud detection that frequently appears in the background of an incorrect, unfair and unlawful presentation of financial statements. This has triggered the necessity to provide a new kind of auditing services that would be directed towards fraud prevention and detection. The answer to this need is the emergence of forensic audit, which differs from external audit in terms of its goals and character. There is no generally accepted definition of this concept, and the paper suggests differences in its definition and characteristics and differences in relation to external audit. The authors also attempt to point out to certain limitations that impede the development of a new audit discipline, which has justified its existence and indicated the necessity for its further development, both in theory and practice.

References

. Hopwood W. S., Leiner, J. J., Young, G. R. Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011, pp…

. Schilit, H.M., Perler, J. How to detect accounting gimmicks & fraud in financial reports. New York: McGrow-Hil, 2010, pp…

. Silverstone, H., Sheetz, M., Pedneault, S., Rudewicz, F. Forensic Accounting and for Non-Experts. Hoboken, New Jersey: 1992, pp.30-50.

. W.G. Kell, W.C. Boynton. Modern auditing. USA: Wiley, 1992, pp. 10.

. Singleton, T., Singleton, A., Bologna, J. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. Haboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp. 67-78.

. David, J.S., Steinbart, P.J. Strategic Finance. USA: 1999, pp. 3036.

. M. Stanishich. Audit methodology (in Serbian). Belgrade: University Singidunum, 2009, pp 178.

. B. Aceski, B. Trajkoski. Internal and external audit (in Macedonian). Prilep: Faculty of Economics, 2004, pp.135.

. Vukelić G. Frauds and forensic audit (in Serbian). Belgrade: University of Metropolitan., 2014, pp.47

Downloads

Published

2020-10-04

How to Cite

Mircheska, K. ., Karadjova, V. ., Blazheva, S. ., Malakovska, M. ., & Nikolovski, P. . (2020). The Importance of Forensic Audit and Differences in Relation to Financial Audit. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 54(2), 190–200. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/11269

Issue

Section

Articles