Exploring Habits of the Mind for Successful and Unsuccessful Writing Learners: A Case Study
A Case Study
AbstractThis study explored habits of the mind for eight successful and unsuccessful writing learners who were taking intermediate writing skills. Researchers’ phenomenological reflection was employed to supplement the exploratory case study design. Three writing tasks and in-depth interview were mainly used to collect data which were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings depicted that successful and unsuccessful writing learners have similarities and differences in habits of their mind. In thinking and practice related habits of the mind, four unsuccessful and two successful learners failed to properly implement in the process of composing. However, successful learners are more curious and open to explore opportunities in dispositional orientations. It was hence inferred that habits of the mind attribute to success in learning writing. Performance differences between these groups and within each group of students imply that habits of the mind are indicators of writing success in settings where learners’ writing has undergone serious failure.
Alhamlan,S. ,Aljasser,H., Almajed, A., Almansour, H.&Alahmad,N.(2018). A systematic review: Using habits of mind to improve student’s thinking in class, curriculum& instruction. Higher Education Studies; Vol. 8, No. 1
Bachman, F.L. and Palmer S.A.(1996). Language testing practice: Designing and developing useful language testing, Oxford University press , Oxford
Bernardsusser, E. (1994). Process approaches in writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3 (I), 31-47
Elbow, P. (1973).Writing without Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fareed, M. Ashraf, A.and Bilal, M.( 2016). ESL learners' writing skills: problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 4(2): 1
Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (2011) by the Council of Writing Program Administrators (CWPA), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and the National Writing Project (NWP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Gross, M. D. & Alexander, J. (2016).Frameworks for Failure Pedagogy: critical approaches to teaching literature, language, composition, and culture. 16, (2), doi 10.1215/15314200-3435884
[ 8] Haider, G. (2012). An insight into difficulties faced by Pakistani student writers: Implications for teaching of writing. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(3),
Heiman, J.(2013).“Odd Topics” and Open Minds Implementing Critical Thinking in Interdisciplinary, Thematic Writing Courses. Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture Volume 14, Number 1 doi 10.1215/15314200-2348929
Huang. C.J.(2014). Learning to write for publication in English through genre-based pedagogy: A case in Taiwan ,System 45, pp175-186
Hyland, K. ( 2002). Teaching and researching writing. Pearson Education Limited Second Edition
Hyland, K. (2003) Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2008). Writing theories and writing pedagogies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching. 4 (2): 91-110.
Johnson, K. (2013). Beyond standards: Disciplinary and national perspectives on habits of mind. College Composition and Communication, 64(3), 517–541
Klein, P.D.,and Boscolo, P. (2016). Trends in research on writing as a learning activity. Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), 311- 350.doi: 10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.01
[ 16] Kobayashi, H. and Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicomponent writer. Japan Journal of Second Language Writing, 22 4–33
Lee, S. (2018). Frameworks for failure in L2 writing: What we can learn from “failures” of Chinese international students in the US University of California. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(2),
Marashia, H., and Tahan-Shizari, P. (2015).Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 99-117
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[ 20]Randaccio, M. (2013). writing skills: theory and practice. QuaderniCIRD n. 7 (2013)
] Wegerif, N., Mercer,R. and Dawes l(1999). Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1,pp 95-111 doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
Weissberg, R. (2006) Connecting speaking and writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of
Zamel, V. (1983a). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case-studies.
TESOL Quarterly, 17: 165–87.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.