Validation of Gamified Instructional Materials in Genetics for Grade 12 STEM Students
AbstractInstructional material is an integral part of teaching and learning process. Validating instructional materials is imperative to ensure quality before widespread utilization. This study validated the developed Gamified Instructional Material (GIM) in genetics for grade 12 STEM students. It employed the descriptive-developmental research design involving 41 STEM students and 11 Biology education experts chosen through purposive sampling. Findings revealed that students and experts strongly agreed that the GIM satisfied the criteria for a sound and valid instructional material. Further, the significant change in the pretest and posttest scores of students indicated an improvement of their knowledge in genetics. It is recommended that the GIM be used as supplementary instructional material in teaching genetics.
. J. Marbas. “The Importance of Instructional Materials.” Internet: www.academia.edu/8704377/The_Importance_of_Instructional_Materials, n.d. [Dec. 10, 2018].
. “D.O. No. 39, s. 2016 - Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda.” Internet: www.deped.gov.ph/2016/06/10/do-39-s-2016-adoption-of-basic-research-agenda/, [Dec. 10, 2018].
. S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled and L. Nacke. “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification,” in Proceedings of the 15th international Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 2011, pp. 9‐15.
. S. D. Borges, V. H. Durelli, H. M. Reis and S. Isotani. “A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing – SAC 14, 2014.
. G. Hwang, L. Yang and S. Wang. “A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students learning performance in natural science courses.” Elsevier Computers & Education, vol. 69, pp. 121-130, Nov. 2013.
. J. Hamari, J. Koivisto and H. Sarsa. “Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification,” in Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Jan. 2014.
. D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre and G. Angelova. “Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study.” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 18, pp. 75-88, Jul. 2015.
. K. Fleischmann and E. Ariel. “Gamification in Science Education: Gamifying Learning of Microscopic Processes in the Laboratory.” Contemporary Educational Technology, pp. 138-159, Apr. 2016.
. A. Iosup and D. Epema. “An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education,” in Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education – SIGCSE 14. 2014.
. I. Yildirim. “The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons.” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 33, pp. 86-92, Apr. 2017.
. A. Funa and D. Ricafort. “Developing Gamified Instructional Materials for Grade 12 STEM.” International Journal for Engineering, Science and Computing, vol. 9(3), pp. 20597-20600. Mar. 2019.
. E. C. Torrefranca. “Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations.” The Normal Lights, vol. 11(1), pp. 43-73, Jun 2017.
. B. V. Bowling, E. E. Acra, L. Wang, M. F. Myers, G. E. Dean, G. C. Markle, C. L. Moskalik, and C. A. Huether. “Development and Evaluation of Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument for Undergraduates.” Genetics, vol. 178(1), pp. 15-22, Jan 2008.
. K. M. Kapp. “Games, Gamification, and the Quest for Learner Engagement.” T+D, vol. 66(6), pp. 64-68, May 2012.
. G. A. Begemann. “The Effects that Behavioral Objectives Have On Short Term Learning for Elementary Educational Students.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Central Missouri, Dec. 2014.
. N. K. Cakir. “Effect of 5E Learning Model on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Science Process Skills: Meta-Analysis Study.” Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 5(11), pp. 157, Oct. 2017.
. J. L. Plass, S. Heidig, E. O. Hayward, B. D. Homer, and E. Um. “Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning.” Learning and Instruction, vol. 29, pp. 128-140, Feb. 2014.
. D. Connolly, J. Dockrell, B. Shield, R. Conetta, C. Mydlarz and T. Cox. “The effects of classroom noise on the reading comprehension of adolescents.” The journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 145(1), pp. 372-381. Jan. 2019.
. J. Sánchez-Martin, F. Cañada-Cañada and M. A. Dávila-Acedo. “Just a game? Gamifying a general science class at university: Collaborative and competitive work implications.” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 26, pp. 51-59. Dec.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.