Views and Experiences of Mucosal Sampling in HIV Clinical Research among Kenyan Volunteers
AbstractHIV transmission predominantly occurs across mucosal surfaces. Efforts to find an effective and efficacious HIV vaccine, requires understanding the various mechanisms of sexual HIV transmission including immune responses to various HIV vaccine candidates along the mucosal pathways. In this paper, we describe the experiences of health volunteers in three Phase 1 HIV vaccines trials and an observation study that comprised of high- risk and low risk healthy participants with regard to the collection of rectal, cervical and seminal mucosal samples. The paper emanates from a study that examined the views and experiences of volunteers in participating in HIV clinical research, at the KAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, Nairobi, Kenya. The study followed a mixed methods phenomenological research approach with a dominant qualitative strand. In the first phase, quantitative data was collected via a survey questionnaire involving 116 volunteers that helped identify 28 volunteers for the qualitative phase. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPPS while qualitative data was transcribed verbatim, thematic themes identified for coding and entered into Atlas ti for analysis. Participants had a mean age of 28.5 ± 5.7 years (range 20–51 years). There were more males (n =85) than females (n= 31). In general, volunteers expressed mixed reactions towards the collection and use of mucosal samples. Both none-consenting and consenting volunteers cited invasiveness of their privacy.Also reported were experiences of physical and psychological discomforts, with men terming the collection of semen via masturbation as unnatural and contravening individuals’ religious and cultural beliefs. The findings reveal a knowledge gap among community members with use of mucosal samples and modes of collection.
. UNAIDS. (2017). Global AIDS Update.
. UNAIDS. (2018). Global AIDS Update: Miles to go-Closing gaps, breaking barriers and righting injustices.
. UNAIDS (2016). Prevention Gap Report.
. National AIDS Control Concil. (2016). Kenya AIDS Response Report. Nairobi.
. NACC/NASCOP (2014). Kenya HIV Prevention Revolution Road Map.
. Vermund SH, Hayes RJ. (2013).Combination prevention: new hope for stopping the epidemic. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 10(2):169e86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11904-013-0155-y.
. Jones J, Sullivan PS, Curran JW. (2019). Progress in the HIV epidemic: Identifying goals and measuring success. PLoS Med. 16(1):e1002729. Published 2019 Jan 18. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002729
. Baeten JM, Heffron R, Kidoguchi L, Mugo NR, Katabira E, Bukusi EA, et al.(2016). Integrated delivery of antiretroviral treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis to HIV-1–serodiscordant couples: a prospective implementation study in Kenya and Uganda. PLoS Med. 13(8):e1002099.
. Esparza J. (2013). A brief history of the global effort to develop a preventive HIV vaccine. Vaccine 31(35):3502e18.
. JeffreyT. Safrit, Patricia E. Fast Lisa Gieber, Hester Kuipers et al (2016). Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines forHIV-1 . Vaccine 34:2921–2925
. Jean-Louis Excler, Merlin L Robb & Jerome H Kim (2014) .HIV-1 vaccines, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 10:6, 1734-1746, DOI: 10.4161/hv.28462
. Omosa-Manyonyi G, Park H, Mutua G, Farah B, Bergin PJ, Laufer D, et al. (2014). Acceptability and Feasibility of Repeated Mucosal Specimen Collection in Clinical Trial Participants in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 9 (10): e110228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110228
. Mayoh Joanne and Onwuegbuzie J.Anthony.(2015). Toward a Conceptualization of Mixed Methods Phenomenological Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Vol. 9(1) 91-107
. Yessis, J. L., Kost, R. G., Lee, L. M., Coller, B. S. and Henderson, D. K. (2012), Development of a Research Participants’ Perception Survey to Improve Clinical Research. Clinical and Translational Science, 5: 452-460. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00443.x
. Lazarus EM, Otwombe K, Adonis T, et al (2014).Uptake of genital mucosal sampling in HVTN 097, a phase 1b HIV vaccine trial in South Africa. PLos One. 9(11):e112303:doi:10.1371/journal.pane.0112303
. Geissler PW (2005). Kachinja are coming: encounters around a medical research project in a Kenyan village. Africa 75: 173–202.
. Fairhead J, Leach M, Small M, et al (2006). Where techno-science meets poverty: medical research and the economy of blood in The Gambia, West Africa. Soc Sci Med 63: 1109–1120.[Crossref] [Google Scholar
. Jonathan Stadler and Eirik Saethre (2010). Rumours about blood and reimbursements in a microbicide gel trial. African Journal of AIDS Research 2010, 9(4): 345–353
. Koen Peeters Grietens, Joan Muela Ribera, Annette Erhart,et al;(2014). Doctors and Vampires in Sub-Saharan Africa: Ethical Challenges in Clinical Trial Research. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 91(2), pp. 213–215 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.13-0630
. Darby, R. (2003). The Masturbation Taboo and the Rise of Routine Male Circumcision: A Review of the Historiography. Journal of Social History, 36(3), 737-757. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3790737
. Prakash O, Kar SK, Sathyanarayana Rao TS. (2014). Indian story on semen loss and related Dhat syndrome. Indian J Psychiatry. 56(4):377-82.
. Gupta, S., Palmer, C., Bik, E. M., Cardenas, J. P. et al., (2018). Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs. Frontiers in public health, 6, 77. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00077.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.