Bringing the Old Back in: Retraditionalizing the Institution of Chieftaincy in the Modern State Governance of Sierra Leone

Authors

  • Hindowa Batilo Momoh University of Sierra Leone

Keywords:

Chieftaincy, Colonialism, Decentralization, Kingship, Retraditionalization, Ritual Chieftaincy, Ruling Houses, Traditional Institution, Sasswood, Governance

Abstract

Modern state governance in Africa in general, and in Sierra Leone in particular, has become excruciatingly challenging following the end of the Cold War in the 1990s and the devastating civil conflicts that followed it. State structures have crumbled and collapsed and, in some cases, atrophied. The central argument of this paper postulates that if chieftaincy in Sierra Leone is “retraditionalized” and, at the same time, adapted to modern changes, and effectively utilized and appropriately enlisted to complement the effort of the enfeebled state institutions it can engender appropriate social change and assist in the political reordering of society. Although seen as a recreated and appropriated by the colonial and post-colonial state apparatus or as an outmoded institution, chieftaincy has shown remarkable resilience and adaptability in the face of the modernist project. Put another way, chieftaincy has resisted extinction and it continues to demonstrate its visibility in most of Africa’s modern state system as a viable and relevant institution capable of cushioning the fledging contemporary African state. A participatory approach to data collection including but not limited to desk review, focus group discussions, and interviews was employed during this research. The researcher experienced some limitations to this study major of which was the unavailability of some key stakeholders (Paramount Chiefs) for interviews and consultations. Besides, some of the literature was not available, which constrained the researcher in gathering primary data. The results indicate that the institution of chieftaincy in Sierra Leone has refused to be relegated to the dustbin of history.

 It is in this vein that this paper argues that the institution of chieftaincy is still relevant as a trusted institution for governance by the majority of people living in rural Sierra Leone.  The paper concludes that traditional leadership can stimulate authentic participatory democracy and provide stability at the local level, which is sine qua non to development since more than 70 per cent of Sierra Leone’s population live in rural areas directly ruled by chiefs.

References

. C. M. Fyle. “The State and the Provision of Social Services in Sierra Leone Since Independence, 1961-1991”, CODESRIA, Dakar Senegal, 1993.

. Abraham. Mende Government and Politics under Colonial Rule: A Historical Study of Political Change in Sierra Leone, Freetown/Oxford: Sierra Leone University Press, 1978.

. Abraham. Mende Government and Politics Under Colonial Rule: A Historical Study of Political Change in Sierra Leone, Freetown/Oxford, Sierra Leone University Press, 1978.

. Abraham. “Paramount Chieftaincy and its Post-Conflict Role in Sierra Leone”, Paper Presented at the Nordic Conference on Peace-building, Freetown, Sierra Leone, November 2-5, 2002.

. W. Zartman. and F. Deng. Traditional Cures of Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine”, London: Lyne Rienner Publishers, 2000.

. O. E. Eghosa. “Applying Traditional Methods to Modern Conflicts: Possibilities and Limits,” In W. Zartman and F. Deng (Ed), Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine, (pp. 201-217) London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

. O. E. Eghosa. “Applying Traditional Methods to Modern Conflicts: Possibilities and Limits,” In William Zartman and F. Deng (Ed), Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine, (pp. 201-217) London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

. F. Nyamnjoh. “Might and Right: Chieftaincy and Democracy in Botswana and Cameroon,” CODESRIA, Kampala, Uganda, 2002

. H. B. Momoh. “Traditional Processes of Peacemaking in War-Torn Societies: Situating the New Relevance of Paramount Chiefs in Promoting Peace among the Mendes of South Eastern Sierra Leone,” PhD Dissertation, Washington D. C.: Howard University, 2004.

. E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal. “Chieftaincy in Africa: Three Facets of a Hybrid Role,” in R. van Dijk and E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal (ed.), African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-Political Landscape, Hamburg, Germany: Lit Verlag Munster, 1999, pp. 21-45.

. K. Little. “Mende Chiefdoms in the Nineteenth Century,” in D. Forde and P. Kaberry ed., West African Kingdoms in the Nineteenth Century, London: Oxford University Press, 1967.

. K. Little. “Mende Chiefdoms in the Nineteenth Century,” in D. Forde and P. Kaberry ed., West African Kingdoms in the Nineteenth Century, London: Oxford University Press, 1967.

. O. Vaughan. Nigerian Chiefs: Traditional Power in Modern Politics, 1890s-1990s, Rochester, New York: Rochester University Press, 2000.

. O. E. Eghosa. “Applying Traditional Methods to Modern Conflicts: Possibilities and Limits,” In W. Zartman and F. Deng. (Ed), Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine”, (pp. 201-217) London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

. M. Mamdani, Citizen and Subjects: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of late Colonialism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.

. R. Sklar. “The African Frontier in Political Science,” in Robert Bates et al ed., Africa and the Disciplines: The Contribution of Research in Africa to the Social Sciences and Humanities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

. W. Zartman. and F. Deng. Traditional Cures of Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine”, London: Lyne Rienner Publishers, 2000.

. Abraham. “Paramount Chieftaincy and its Post-Conflict Role in Sierra Leone”, Paper Presented at the Nordic Conference on Peace-building, Freetown, Sierra Leone, November 2-5, 2002.

. Abraham. “Paramount Chieftaincy and its Post-Conflict Role in Sierra Leone”, Paper Presented at the Nordic Conference on Peace-building, Freetown, Sierra Leone, November 2-5, 2002.

. Oomen. “We must go back to our History: Retraditionalization in a Northern Province Chieftaincy”, African Studies, 59, 1, pp. 71-95, 2000.

. M. Kilson. Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization Process in Sierra Leone, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.

. Abraham. Mende Government and Politics under Colonial Rule: A Historical Study of Political Change in Sierra Leone, Freetown/Oxford: Sierra Leone University Press, 1978.

. E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal. “Chieftaincy in Africa: Three Facets of a Hybrid Role,” in Rijk van Dijk and E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal (ed.), African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-Political Landscape, Hamburg, Germany: Lit Verlag Munster, 1999, pp. 21-45.

. E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal. “Chieftaincy in Africa: Three Facets of a Hybrid Role,” in Rijk van Dijk and E. A. B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal (ed.), African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-Political Landscape, Hamburg, Germany: Lit Verlag Munster, 1999, pp. 21-45.

. S. Oladosu. “The Role of Traditional Rulers in Nation-Building,” in Oladimeji Aborisade (ed.), Local Government and the Traditional Rulers in Nigeria, Ile-Ife, Nigeria: University of Ife, pp. 148-169, 1985.

. S. Oladosu. “The Role of Traditional Rulers in Nation-Building,” in Oladimeji Aborisade (ed.), Local Government and the Traditional Rulers in Nigeria, Ile-Ife, Nigeria: University of Ife, pp. 148-169, 1985.

. E. Conteh-Morgan and M. Dixon-Fyle. Sierra Leone at the End of the Twentieth Century: History, Politics and Society, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1999.

. Abraham. “Paramount Chieftaincy and its Post-Conflict Role in Sierra Leone”, Paper Presented at the Nordic Conference on Peace-building, Freetown, Sierra Leone, November 2-5, 2002.

. Abraham. “Paramount Chieftaincy and its Post-Conflict Role in Sierra Leone”, Paper Presented at the Nordic Conference on Peace-building, Freetown, Sierra Leone, November 2-5, 2002.

. M. Kilson. Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization Process in Sierra Leone, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.

. P. Robinson. “African Traditional Rulers and the Modern State: The Linkage Role of Chiefs in the Republic of Niger,” PhD Dissertation, New York: Columbia University, 1975.

. W. Zartman. and F. Deng. Traditional Cures of Modern Conflicts: African Conflicts “Medicine”, London, Lyne Rienner Publishers, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-27

How to Cite

Momoh, H. B. (2019). Bringing the Old Back in: Retraditionalizing the Institution of Chieftaincy in the Modern State Governance of Sierra Leone. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 48(2), 68–88. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/10032

Issue

Section

Articles