Measurement of Regional Financial Management Information Systems Success in Denpasar City Government

  • Ida Ayu Agung Emawati Department of Accounting, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
  • Herkulanus Bambang Suprasto Department of Accounting, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
  • Asri Dwija Putri Department of Accounting, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
Keywords: System Quality, Information Quality, Supervision Action, User Satisfaction, Net Benefits.

Abstract

SIPKD is a regional financial system that is used by the Denpasar City Government in on financial management activities so as to be able to produce financial reports of local governments. Since the implementation of the SIPKD, the Denpasar City Government had obtained an increase in Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia’s Audit Opinion on Local Government Financial Reports, namely Unqualified Opinion for six years. Based on this phenomenon, this study examined the measurement of SIPKD success in Denpasar City Government. The measurement of the success of SIPKD is based on DeLone and McLean model. This study examines the effect of system quality, information quality, and supervision action on user satisfaction and net benefits, the effect of user satisfaction on net benefits, and the effect of system quality, information quality, and supervision action on net benefits through user satisfaction. The sample determination technique used purposive sampling with the criteria of all SIPKD users in Denpasar City Government, as many as 99 people. Data collection used a questionnaire that distributed to 36 OPDs in the Denpasar City Government. Data analysis used Partial Least Square. The results showed that system quality, information quality, and supervision action had a positive effect on user satisfaction and net benefits. User satisfaction had a positive effect on net benefits. User satisfaction is not able to mediate the effect of system quality, information quality, and supervision action of net benefits.

References

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. “Theory of Reasoned Action/Theory of Planned Behavior”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1980.

Badan Pengelola Keuangan dan Aset Daerah. (2017). “Laporan Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintah LKJIP 2017”.

Davis, Fred D., Bagozzi, Richard P., and Warshaw, Paul R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison Two Theoretical Models”. Management Science, vol 35, pp. 982-1003. Aug. 1989.

DeLone, W.H. and Mclean, Ephraim R. “Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable”. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol 3, pp. 60-95, Mar. 1992.

DeLone, W.H. and Mclean, Ephraim R. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success A Ten-Years Update”. Journal of Management Information Systems. vol 19, pp. 9-30. Spring. 2003.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Keuangan Daerah Kementerian Dalam Negeri. “Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (SIPKD)”. Internet: http://keuda.kemendagri.go.id/sipkd, [May, 5, 2018]

Hasanati, Akram, and Irwan, M. “Pengaruh Tindakan Supervisi, Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Profesionalisme Auditor terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Auditor”. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, vol 18, pp. 13-27, Jan. 2017.

Jogiyanto. (2007). Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan (6th edition).

Liu, C. and Arnett, K. P. “Exploring the Factors Associated with Web Site Success in the Context of Electronic Commerce”. Information and Management, vol 38, pp. 23-33, 2000.

Livari, Juhani, “An Empirical Test of the DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success”. Database for Advances in Information Systems, vol 36, pp. 8-27. Spring. 2005.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2013). “Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Berbasis Akrual”.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2010). “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2010 tentang Perubahan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2005 tentang Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah”.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2010). “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indoesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2010 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah”.

Pitt, Watson, and Kavan. “Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness”. MIS Quarterly, vol 19, pp. 173-187, June. 1995.

Seddon.P.B. “A Respecification and Extension of The DeLone and McLean’s Model of IS Success”. Information System Research. vol 8, pp. 240-250. Sept. 1997.

Venkatesh, Morris, and Davis. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View”. MIS Quarterly, vol 27, pp. 425-478.Sept. 2003.

Published
2019-05-12
Issue
Vol 46 No 1 (2019)
Section
Articles

Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
  5. It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper.  The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
  6. Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
  7. Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
  8. If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
  9. The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.