The Phenomenological, Structural Synthesis Methodology for Art Theory
Keywords:
synthesis methodology, corporeal category, art theory, art interpretationAbstract
This paper reflects the practical importance of phenomenological, structural synthesis methods, which are universal research methods based on phenomenological methods. Also, the possibility of using this method in the interpretation of works of art was raised. In addition, phenomenological and structuralist synthesis method is explained within the framework of art theory, strengthening the possibility of using it within the popular categories of philosophy called Corporeality, anthropology and cultural studies.
References
H.G. Gadamer. Istina I Metod. Moskva: Progress, 1988.
A. V. Makeenkova. “Ponimanie iskusstva kak osnovnaya zadacha sovremennogo iskusstvoznaniya”. Hudozhestvennaya Kultura 3(4), 2012, pp. 3-8.
G.V.F. Gegel. Estitika v 4-h tomah. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1968-1973.
E. Gombrih. Istoriya Iskusstva. Moskva: ACT, 1995.
Gombosuren, Ts. Filosofy. Ulaanbaatar: MUIS Press, 2020.
Altankhuyag, B. Nokhoin hevtriin fenomenologi. 2015, November 18. https://tagtaa.mn/ako/1
H.G. Gadamer. Aktualnost’ prekrasnogo. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1991.
Orgilbold Narandorj. “Urnu ba Dorno. Tugs khunii ereld”. Khungun aj uildver, 2016, pp. 7–14.
Ya.B. Barichko. K probleme telesnoti vizualnih obrazov. Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoi akademii kulturi I iskusstv 1 (29), 2012. pp. 96-98.
E. Gusserl. Kartezianskie razmishleniya. SPb.: Nauka, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
