Improvement Strategy Service Functional Eligibility Certificate Using the AHP Method
Keywords:
AHP, Triangulation, SLF, Strategy, FailureAbstract
Failure building is one? worry for owner building. There is usually failure because of errors in planning, so the government makes an effort to enforce regulation of SLF applications. The goal is to ensure a level of safety, convenience, and health building. However, in implementation publishing, there are inhibiting factors. The objective of the study is to develop improvement strategies for SLF service. The AHP method is used as evaluation in compile priority, which is later level 80% priority is used for developing strategies through the Triangulation Method. For priorities selected as follows: implementation of SLF socialization; existence building Regional Regulation; fulfillment of admin and technical requirements; HR competency who understands SLF response building owner; availability of consultant; concern public against SLF; coordination between service technical; completeness tool help inspection building eligibility; completeness document licensing; standardization to mechanism evaluation. For the sake of improving SLF services in Jember Regency, then the strategy can be taken is need procurement socialization of the importance of SLF in society, information building regulations are tightened and distributed in a way evenly, necessary good coordination? between departments, consultants, and applicants. Besides that, additional human resources are needed for officer SLF issuance to speed up the implementation process.
References
V. T. Nguyen, S. T. Do, N. M. Vo, T. A. Nguyen, and S. V. H. Pham, “An Analysis of Construction Failure Factors to Stakeholder Coordinating Performance in the Finishing Phase of High-Rise Building Projects,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/6633958.
Putri Kurniawati, “Unravelling Causes of Quality Failures in Building Energy Renovation Projects of Northern China: Quality Management Perspective,” ASCE Libr., vol. 01, pp. 1–7, 2017.
K. Wardhana and F. C. Hadipriono, “Study of Recent building Failures in the United States,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 151–158, 2023, doi: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2003)17:3(151).
R. D. Juliardi, E. R. Puri, and M. I. Aziza, “Temporary Occupancy Permit ( SLF ) for building Sustainable Strategy,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 738, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012079.
F. S. Hudson, M. Sutrisna, and G. Chawynski, “A certification framework for managing the risks of non-compliance and non-conformance building products: a Western Australian perspective,” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 312–343, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-11-2019-0097.
Mulyo, “Certification of the Functionality of State buildings at the Semarang City Government,” “Sustainable Archit. Urban., pp. 84–86, 2019.
H. B. Siti Shamsiah, “The Issues of The Implementation of The Certificate of Completion And Compliance (CCC) in Klang Valley,” Univ. Teknol. Mara, no. c, p. 634, 2019.
Zenith, “Evaluation of the Implementation of the Functional Worthiness Certificate in Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2012 concerning buildings in Malang City,” Malang Univ. Brawijaya, vol. ????? ????, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1121-6%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-018-0101-2%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.04.019%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.10.014%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.041%0Ahttp://arxiv.org/abs/1502.020
Y. Liu, C. M. Eckert, and C. Earl, “A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgments,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 161, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.
K. Xu and J. Xu, “A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process,” Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 359–388, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10700-020-09323-y.
S. Pant, A. Kumar, M. Ram, Y. Klochkov, and H. K. Sharma, “Consistency Indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Review,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10081206.
J. Aguarón, M. T. Escobar, J. M. Moreno-Jiménez, and A. Turón, “The triads geometric consistency index in the-pairwise comparison matrices,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 6, 2020, doi 10.3390/math8060926.
R. P.-G. J. Benítez, X. Delgado-Galván, J. Izquierdo, “Improving consistency in decision-making,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 219, no. 5, pp. 2432–2441, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/22-refugee-law/improving-consistency-decision-making
V. Pereira and U. Bamel, “Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 635–651, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7.
O. A. Bafail, R. M. S. Abdulaal, and M. R. Kabli, “AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University,” Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/systems10040107.
C. L. Lin, C. L. Fan, and B. K. Chen, “Hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process–Artificial Neural Network Model for Predicting the Major Risks and Quality of Taiwanese Construction Projects,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12157790.
F. Idris, A. Amir, and A. Marisa, “Priority of Maintenance of Structural and Architectural Elements Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” Civilla J. Tek. Sipil Univ. Islam Lamongan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2023, doi: 10.30736/cvl.v8i1.1023.
H. Pratiwi, “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process.” 2020.
S. S. d Rahul Ravichandran a, Raviraj Ayyavoo b, Lalitha Rajangam a, Nagarajan Madasamy a, Basker Murugaiyan c, “Identification of groundwater potential zone using analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for Bhavani river basin, Tamil Nadu, southern India,” Groundw. Sustain. Dev., vol. 18, pp. 1–7, 2022.
L. Xiao, F. Li, C. Niu, G. Dai, Q. Qiao, and C. Lin, “Evaluation of Water Inrush Hazard in Coal Seam Roof Based on the AHP-CRITIC Composite Weighted Method,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16010114.
D. M. Kucuker and D. Cedano Giraldo, “Assessment of soil erosion risk using an integrated approach of GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Erzurum, Turkiye,” Ecol. Inform., vol. 71, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101788.
M. D. Desta, T. Tesseme, T. T. Yigezu, and A. B. Nigussie, “Assessment of landfill site suitability using GIS, remote sensing, and the multi-criteria decision-making (AHP) approach, Ethiopia,” Geol. Ecol. Landscapes, 2023, doi 10.1080/24749508.2023.2256549.
A. Bans-Akutey and B. M. Tiimub, “Triangulation in Research,” Acad. Lett., no. October, 2021, doi: 10.20935/al3392.
S. Yeasmin and Rahman. K.F, “’ Triangulation ’ Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research,” Bup J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://www.bup.edu.bd/journal/154-163.pdf
R. Campbell, R. Goodman-Williams, H. Feeney, and G. Fehler-Cabral, “Assessing Triangulation Across Methodologies, Methods, and Stakeholder Groups: The Joys, Woes, and Politics of Interpreting Convergent and Divergent Data,” Am. J. Eval., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 125–144, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1098214018804195.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
