Attitude and Cognitive Achievement in VLab Experience of STEM Learners in Chemistry

Authors

  • Alvin Q. Larida Department of Education-Libertad National High School, South Cotabato, 9512 Philippines, College of Education, Mindanao State University, General Santos City, 9500 Philippines
  • Paul R. Olvis College of Education, Mindanao State University, General Santos City, 9500 Philippines
  • Berlita Y. Disca College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Mindanao State University, General Santos City, Philippines
  • Aida F. Docena Mindanao State University-CETD, General Santos City, 9500 Philippines

Keywords:

Virtual Laboratory (vLab), Attitudes, Cognitive Achievement, Chemistry Laboratory, STEM Learners

Abstract

Laboratory applications are of significant importance in chemistry education due to various limitations and deficiency conditions of the recent traditional laboratory. Objective: In order to address the gap, this study examined the effect of virtual laboratory (vLab) on the attitude and cognitive achievement and the relationship of these two variables with one another among 59 STEM students of eleventh-grade (control and experimental group). Methods: Study were gathered with pre and posttest using Chemistry Attitude Scale (CAS1), Cognitive Achievements Scale (CAS2) test, and augmented with semi-structured interview (ssi) for those who experienced vLab. Comparisons were made within and between groups. Using SPSS software, the mean scores, t-test, and Pearson Product correlation(r) were used to analyze the data, while thematic analysis was used for ssi result.  Conclusion: It was concluded that both traditional and virtual laboratory elicited positive attitudes and average cognitive achievement among students. Moreover, the virtual laboratory is at least as effective as the traditional laboratory, both in terms of students’ attitudes and cognitive achievements. The findings showed also, that there is significant positive relationship in the students’ attitude and cognitive achievement in chemistry for both traditional and vLab groups.  Furthermore, some students agreed that the vLab can help them to perform the experiments quickly, it invites their interest to move further in the activity, and can perform on their own pace. Recommendation: This also suggests that further study is needed in different domains and subscales of attitudes, development of instructional materials which focuses on Bloom’s taxonomy should be supplemented for instructions, and enhance quality virtual laboratory to be added to the pedagogy.

References

. Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on Students’ Achievement and attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Education Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.

. Zacharia, Z. (2003). Using interactive simulations to enhance students’ explanations regarding physical phenomena. ResearchGate.

. Langley, P. W., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J. M. (1987) Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery, Routledge, New York.

. McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research - The Key to Student Learning”. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127-1137.

. McDermott, L.C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research - The Key to Student Learning. American Journal Physics, 69(11), 1127-1137.

. Onyesolu, M. O. (2009). Virtual Reality Laboratories: An ideal Solution to the Problems Facing Laboratory Setup and Management. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 (WCECS 2009) I, San Francisco, USA.

. Dobransky L. & Honyzs, R. (2007). Materials science virtual laboratory as an example of the computer aid in materials engineering. Journal of achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24. pp. 219-222.

. Rutten, N., Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J.T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58, 136-153.

. Tatli, Z. & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students’ Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1). 159-170.

. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R (2010). How many people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school?. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.17226/9853.

. Gregorc, A. (1982). Inside styles: Beyond the basics. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates.

. Durmus, J., & Bayraktar, S. (2010). Effects of conceptual change texts and laboratory experiments on fourth grade students’ understanding of matter and change concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 498-504.

. Rodrigues, S. (1997). Fitness for Purpose: A glimpse at When, Why and How to Use information Technology in Science Lessons. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43 (2), 38-39.

. Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2001). Pupils’ attitudes, perception and understanding of primary science: comparisons between Northern Irish and English schools. Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, England.

. Tesfaye, C.L., & White, S. (2012). High School Physics? Results from the 2008-09 Nationwide Survey of High School Physics Teachers. Focus On. AIP Statistical Center. Retrieved at http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/hsteachers.pdf

. Borras-Linares, I., et al, (2011) Development of virtual laboratory experiments for chemistry students. 3rd International Conference on Education and New learning Technologies (ED-ULEARN). Barcelona, Spain, 3134-3139.

. Kaousar, T. Bushra, & Arjaz (2008). A study of effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) over Classroom Lecture (CRL) at ICS level. I-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology. Vol. 2(1), 48-59.

. Serin, O. (2011). The effects of the computer-based instruction on the achievement and problem solving skills of the science and technology students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 183-184.

. Yang, K.Y.., Heh, J. S., (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics. Science process skilss and computer attitudes of 10th grade students, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16:451-461

. Brahler, C. Jayne (2005). Developing on-line learning materials for higher education: An overview of current issues. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.

. Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA, Wiley, Pfeiffer.

. Blume, F., et al, (2018). Do students learn better when seated close to the teacher? A virtual classroom study considering individual levels of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity. Learning and Instruction. Retrieved on October 12, 2018 from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstrue.2018.10.004.

. Hussain, A. (2006). Effect of guidance services on study attitudes, study habits and academic achievement of secondary school students. Bulletin of Education & Research, 28 (1), 35-45.

. Ozdemir, M., & Kaptan, F. (2013). An investigation of pre-service primary teachers’ science process skills and attitude toward science education. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 1,62-75.

. Koballa, T. R. & Crawley, F.E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222-232.

. Adesokan, C.O. (2002). Students attitude and gender as determinants of performance. JSS Integrated Science. B. Ed Project of Chemistry of Nigeria.

. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2001). Gender difference in attitude-achievement over time among white middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39,324-340.

. Vilia, P.; Candeias, A.; Neto, A.; Da Gloria, M,; & Melo, M. (2017). Academic Achievement in Physics-Chemistry: The Predictive Effect of Attitudes and Reasoning Abilities. Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 1064.

. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group).

. Bakar H.N.B.& Zaman, H.,H.,B.(2007). Development of Vlab-chem for Chemistry Subject Based on Constructivism-Cognitivism-Contextual Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering. Inf. Intstitut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, 567-570.

. Alkan F., Kocak, C. (2014). Chemistry laboratory applications supported with simulation. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82749717.pdf.

. Zacharia, Z. (2003). Using interactive simulations to enhance students' explanations regarding physical phenomena. Ankara, Turkey.

. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi experimental design for research on teaching, In N.L. Gage (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand, Mcnally.

. Doepken, D., Lawsky, E., & Linda, P. (2014). Modified Fennema-Sherman attitude scales. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/748467?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

. Aşiksoy, G. (2007). The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’ attitudes in a General Physics Laboratory. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoc.v13i04.6811.

. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group).

. Awan, R. & Sarwar, M. (2011). Attitudes toward science among school students of different nations: A review study. Journal of College Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265036809.

. Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C. & Almedia, L. (2002). Science Learning in Virtual Environments: A Descriptive Study, British Journal of Educational Technology¸33(4), 471-488.

. Cetin, O.S., Gulhan, M. & Katranci, M. (2018). A study on the effect of pre-school education on early literacy skills. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 201-221.

. Capar, G. & Tarim, K. (2013). Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.

. Rajendran, L. and Divya, R. (2010). A study on the effectiveness of virtual lab in E-learning. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering. 02(06), 2173-2175.

. Bernard,S. (2004). Simulation as a tool in understading the concepts of lean manufacturing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549704045049.

. Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M. & Clark, T. (2004). Research and practice in K-12 Online Learning: A review of open access literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1).

. Sengel, E., Ozden, M.Y. & Geban, O. (2002). The influence of simulated experiments supported with computer on high school students comprehending the displacement and velocity concepts. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Symposium, Ankara: ODTU.

. Limniou, M., Papadopoulos, N., Giannakoudakis, A., Roberts, D. & Otto, O. (2007). The integration of a viscosity simulator in a chemistry laboratory chemistry. Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 220-231.

. Bakar H.N.B.& Zaman, H.,H.,B.(2007). Development of Vlab-chem for Chemistry Subject Based on Constructivism-Cognitivism-Contextual Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering. Inf. Intstitut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, 567-570.

. Kennepohl, D. (2001). Using Computer Simulations to Supplement teaching Lab in Chemistry for Distance Delivery. The Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 58-65.

. Erdogan, Y., Bayram, S. & Deniz, L. (2008). Factors that influence academic achievement and attitudes in web-based education. International Journal of Instruction, 1 (1), 31-48.

. O’Connell, S. (2000). Introduction to Problem- Solving strategies for Elementary Mathematics classroom, N.H. Heinemann.

. Singh, K., Granville, M. & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.

. Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N.Y., Pervukhina, I. & Tchernysheva, A. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology.

. Demeril, O. (2004). Thermodynamic Analysis of Separation Systems. Separation Science and Technology, 39(16).

. Batuyong, C. & Antonio, V. (2018). Exploring the effect of PhET® Interactive Simulation-Based activities on students’ performance and learning experiences in electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121-131.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Q. Larida, A. ., R. Olvis, P. ., Y. Disca, B. ., & F. Docena, A. . (2021). Attitude and Cognitive Achievement in VLab Experience of STEM Learners in Chemistry. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 58(2), 43–62. Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/12588

Issue

Section

Articles