Palimasan Baanjung: Variant of Banjar Traditional House in Banjarmasin, Indonesia

  • Wasita Doctoral Study Program of Agricultural Science, Postgraduate Program, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jalan Jenderal A. Yani KM 36 Banjarbaru 70714, Indonesia.
  • Wahyu Study Program of Sociology and Anthropology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jalan Brigjend Hasan Basry Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia.
  • Udiansyah Study Program of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jalan Jenderal A. Yani KM 36 Banjarbaru 70714, Indonesia.
  • M. Husaini Study Program of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jalan Jenderal A. Yani KM 36 Banjarbaru 70714, Indonesia.
Keywords: Banjar traditional house, palimasan baanjung, typology, subtype

Abstract

Structural designs are potential sources of expression, in terms of traditions, and also assist in preserving the cultural heritage of most communities.The palimasan baanjung (with anjung roof) exists as a novel variant with a unique shape, compared to other eleven Banjar traditional house categories mentioned in literatures. This paper is, therefore, aimed at presenting and placing the new alternative into various types or subtypes of Banjar houses. Descriptive writing technique was adopted, while essential data were compiled through observations, interviews, and available documents. The results showed the modern structure with a significant segment was classified into palimasan type and palimasan baanjung subtype. However, the basis for the grouping relates to the robust similarity in the form of rudimentary plan, main and terrace roof shapes, as well as the supporting pillars.

References

. S. Seman and Irhamna, Arsitektur Tradisional Banjar, Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin: Lembaga Pengkajian dan Pelestarian Budaya Banjar Kalimantan Selatan, 2011.

. Z. H. Achmad, “Typology of Bena Traditional Architecture, Flores,” Local Wisdom J. Ilm. Kaji. Kearifan Lokal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 90–106, Jul. 2019.

. V. A. Gorodzov, “The Typological Method in Archaeology,” Am. Anthropol., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 1933.

. S. Schwartz, “A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications,” Comp. Sociol., vol. 5, no. 2–3, pp. 137–182, 2006.

. M. N. Ririmasse, “Abad Baru Purbakala: Memilih Arah Menentukan Peran Penelitian Arkeologi di Maluku,” Kapata Arkeol., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 75, Aug. 2016.

. S. Barliana, “Tradisionalitas Dan Modernitas Tipologi Arsitektur Masjid,” Dimens. J. Archit. Built Environ., vol. 32, no. 2, Jan. 2004.

. G. Suharjanto, “Keterkaitan Tipologi dengan Fungsi dan Bentuk: Studi Kasus Bangunan Masjid,” ComTech Comput. Math. Eng. Appl., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 975–982, Dec. 2013.

. H. Yu, X. Sui, and M. Jiao, “Protection and Renewal of Historic Blocks Based on Architectural Typology,” Art Des. Rev., vol. 06, no. 03, pp. 115–124, 2018.

. M. Bandini, “Typology as a Form of Convention,” AA Files, no. 6, pp. 73–82, 1984.

. A. R. Afdholy, “‘Rumah Lanting’ Arsitektur Vernakular Suku Banjar Yang Mulai Punah,” Local Wisdom J. Ilm. Kaji. Kearifan Lokal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 103–117, Feb. 2017.

. I. Mentayani and P. R. Muthia, “Menggali Makna Arsitektur Vernakular: Ranah, Unsur, dan Aspek-Aspek Vernakularitas,” in Temu Ilmiah Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia 6, 2017, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. I109–I116.

. J. C. Driver, K. Bovy, V. L. Butler, K. D. Lupo, R. L. Lyman, and C. Otaola, “Identification, Classification and Zooarchaeology,” Ethnobiol. Lett., vol. 2, pp. 19–39, Jan. 2011.

. P. Jeraman, “Tipologi Arsitektur Rumah Sabu (Ammu Hawu), Sebuah Pendekatan Deskriptif Antropologis,” J. Arsit. Komposisi, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 225–256, May 2019.

. F. Sugata and Y. Chandrahera, “Identifikasi Tipologi Arsitektur pada Rumah Tradisional Bangsawan Thailand: Phra Tamnak Daeng, Bangkok,” in Prosiding Budaya dan Kearifan Lokal untuk Masa Depan: Antara Tantangan dan Peluang Era Disrupsi, 2019, pp. 18–38.

. I. Mentayani and D. N. Andhini, “Tipologi Dan Morfologi Arsitektur Suku Banjar Di Kal-Sel,” Infoteknik, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 2007.

. Y. H. Prasetyo, M. N. F. Alfata, and A. R. Pasaribu, “Typology of Malay Traditional House Rumah Lontiok and its Response to the Thermal Environment,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 20, pp. 162–171, 2014.

. H. Saad et al., “Typology of Malay Traditional House and its Response to the Thermal Environment,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 19, pp. 1761–1770, 2019.

. A. D. Jiboye, “Significance of House-Type as a Determinant of Residential Quality in Osogbo, Southwest Nigeria,” Front. Archit. Res., vol. 3, pp. 20–27, 2014.

. R. Herminingtyas, “Manajemen Perubahan (Management of Change),” J. STIE Semarang (Edisi Elektron., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 76–83, 2010.

. B. N. Muchamad and A. Ronald, “Arsitektur Melayu Banjar: Ajaran Islam dalam Budaya Melayu Banjar berkaitan dengan Konsep Arsitekturnya,” in Kumpulan Makalah Humanisme, Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, 2010, pp. 109–117.

. J. M. J. P. Santoso, “Tipologi Membuka Ruang Bagi Fungsi dan Bentuk,” J. Kaji. Teknol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 91–101, 2013.

. M. Rifqi and N. S. Antariksa, “Ruang Sosial Rumah Tradisional Baanjungan di Banjarmasin,” Arsit. e-Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2014.

. D. U. Binan, M. Kapti, B. Kiraç, and T. Töre, “An Approach to Define and Evaluate the Traditional Houses in Western Anatolia Accordance to the Urban Cultural Heritage Inventory Project of Bergama,” in Euro-Mediterranean Regional Conference Traditional Mediterranean Architecture Present and Future, 2007, pp. 72–74.

. T. Widyanti, “Penerapan Nilai-nilai Kearifan Lokal dalam Budaya Masyarakat Kampung Adat Cireundeu sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran IPS,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 161–166, Apr. 2015.

. Y. Mahgoub, “Architecture and the Expression of cultural Identity in Kuwait,” J. Archit., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 165–182, Apr. 2007.

. M. Sopa, “Local Wisdom in the Cultural Symbol of Indonesian Traditional House,” in Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, 2018, pp. 524–531.

Published
2021-03-30
Section
Articles