Green Building Concept on the Planning of Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Building at Jember University
Keywords:
GBCI, Greenship rating tool version 1.2, Design recognition stageAbstract
The rapid growing of development in Indonesia has increased the energy needs and made current Green Building issue become very important. To support the development, green building is regulated in the policies and programs to improve energy efficiency, water, and building materials as well as increasing the use of low carbon technology. This study aims to carry out the design recognition stage by identifying and ranking the 5 (five) Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Building at Universitas Jember based on the criteria of using a greenship assessment tool for GBCI's new building version 1.2. The results show that the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Building at Universitas Jember for GBCI access data meet 4 (four) building eligibility criteria but does not meet 3 (three) other eligibility criteria. The value/points of the Auditorium Building is 28 (two eight) points (36,36%/Bronze), Biotechnology Engineering Building is 30 (thirty) points (38,96%/Bronze), Plant and Natural Medicine Building and Health and Nurse of Biotechnology is 41 (forty one) points (53,20%/Silver), Natural Science and Food Technology Building (38,96%/Bronze), and Science and Public Communication Building is 30 (thirty) points (38,96%/Bronze).
References
. Fauzi, “Kajian Sistem Assessment Proses Konstruksi Pada Greenship Rating Tool,” Kaji. Sist. Assess. Proses Konstr. pada Greensh. Rat. Tool, no. November, pp. 111–120, 2012.
. D. Rintawati et al., “Kinerja Pengembang Gedung Bertingkat Dalam Penggunaan,” vol. 7, no. KoNTekS 7, pp. 24–26, 2013.
. O. D. El Monayeri and N. Alkhozondar, “Optimizing Natural Lighting Analyses for Existing Buildings to Minimize Usage of Artificial Lighting and Green House Gas Effect,” Optim. Nat. Light. Anal. Exist. Build. to Minimize Usage Artif. Light. Green House Gas Eff., vol. 4531, pp. 284–296, 2015.
. T. Sipil, I. T. Nasional, and K. Kunci, “Dalam Penerapan Konsep Green Building Di Itenas,” pp. 22–27.
. GBC Indonesia, “Achievementof Green Building Council Indonesia 2018,” p. 1040, 2018, doi: 10.1108/ijppm.2004.07953dab.003.
. A. Ratnaningsih et al., “Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Pembangunan Gedung IsDB Project Berdasarkan Skala Indeks Menggunakan Greenship Versi 1 . 2 ( Studi Kasus : Gedung Engineering Biotechnology Universitas Jember ) ( Assessment Green Building Criteria for The Constructi,” vol. 2, 2014.
. GBCI, “Green Building Council Indonesia Versi 1.1,” Greensh. New Build., pp. 6–10, 2010.
. GBCI, “Green Building Council Indonesia Versi 1.2,” Greensh. New Build., no. April, 2013.
. M. F. Faizi et al., “Evaluation of Green Building Eligibility Criteria in the Faculty of Medicine Building, Muhammadiyah University, Surakarta,” Assiut J. Environ. Stud., vol. The curren, no. 1, p. 43, 2017, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
. dan C. U. Aristia A. Putri, M. Arif Rohman and I. T. S. N. (ITS) Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, “Penilaian Kriteria Green building pada Gedung Rektorat ITS,” J. Tek. POM
. GBCI, “Greenship Rating Tools Greenship untuk Gedung Baru,” no. April, 2012.
. A. C. Nugroho, “Sertifikasi Arsitektur/Bangunan Hijau : Menuju Bangunan yang Ramah Lingkungan,” J. Arsit. Univ. Bandar Lampung, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
