Determination of Optimum Rate of Blended Fertilizer for Pod Yield of Snap Bean (Pharsalus vulgaris L.) at Teda, North Gondar, Ethiopia

Tesfaye Wossen


Therefore based on the governments direction to use blended fertilizer instead of di-ammonium phosphate, use of 300 kg/ha blended fertilizer can be used as an option to maximize snap bean productivity and higher return.

Snap bean is one of the important legume vegetable crops. Snap bean production in Ethiopia has both challenge and opportunity. But there is limited research regarding the response of snap bean to different sources of fertilizer. There is no site and crop specific rate determination of blended fertilizer was not done yet. Seven blended fertilizer with the recommended NP2O5 rates were evaluated during 2016 offseason by irrigation at Teda experimental site of University of Gondar, northwest part of Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of Idom variety of snap bean to different levels of blended fertilizer in the study area. The trail was laid out in the randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance showed significant variation among varieties for all the parameters studied such as number of pods/plant, pod length, pod diameters, plant height, pod yield and biomass. The blended fertilizer rate the recommended NP2O5 and 300kg/ha blended fertilizer gave high pod yield 8.6 ton/ha and 4.3 ton/ha respectively. The partial analysis result showed that the recommended NP2O5 and 300kg/ha blended fertilizer have a net benefit of 139,645.5and 66,726.8 birr and 36,459.4 and 3396.66% marginal rate of return per one birr of investment respectively.


snap bean ; pod yield ; blended fertilizer.

Full Text:



. Abate, G. (2006). The market for fresh snap beans. Working Paper, The Strategic Marketing Institute, pp: 6-8.

. Abdel-Mawgoud A.M.R. El-Desuki M, Salman S.R, Abou-Hussein D. (2005). Performance of some snap bean varieties as affected by different levels of mineral fertilizers. Journal of Agronomy 4(3): 242-247.

. Agricultural Transformation Agency and USAID (2015). Feed the Future, Research for Ethiopia's Agricultural Policy, Research for Ethiopia's Agricultural policy, USAID& ATA.

. CIMMYT (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico.

. Dessalegn, L.(2003). Snapbean production and research status in Ethiopia. Research Report, Ethiopia.

. Dessalegn, L. S. Ketema, A. Aragaw and S. Aklilu (2006). Varietal development of major vegetables in the rift valley region. Proceeding of the Inaugural and 1st Ethiopian Horticultural Science Society, February 4-5, 2011, Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia.

. FAO (2009). Production year book .Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. Rome: FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)-Available at

. Gezahegne A , Dawit A (2006). Food and forage legumens of Ethiopia : progress and prospect proceedings of the work shop on food and forage legume , 22- 26 September 2003. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

. Hannibal L.and Meron L. (2012). Rate determine of inorganic fertilizers of N and P2O5 for snap bean on Dembia districts Ethiopia.

. Hedge D.M. and Srinivas K. (2004). Plant water relations and nutrient uptake in French bean. Journal of Irrigation Science 11: 51-56.

. Khalid Bomba (2013). CEO of the Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency publish on April 9th

. Mahmoud A.R., El-Desuki M., Abdel-Mouty M. M. (2010). Response of snap bean plants to bio-fertilizer and nitrogen level application. International Journal of Academic Research, 2 (3).

. Minister of Agriculture (2014). Ethiopia First Ever fertilizer Blending plant inaugurated report.

. Otieno P.E., Muthomi J.W., Cheminingwa G.N., Nderitu J.H. (2009). Effect of rhizobia inoculation, farm yard manure and nitrogen fertilizer on nodulation and yield of food grain legumes. Journal of Biological Sciences 9(4):326-332.

. Piha, M.I. and D.N. Munnus (1987). Nitrogen fixation potential of beans (Pharsalus vulgaris L.) compared with other grain legumes under controlled conditions. Plant Soil, 98: 169?182

. Rubatzkey VE, Yamagucbi M. (1999). World Vegetable; Principles Production and Nutritive Values.2nd edition, Aspen publishers. California. USA.

. Salinas, R.N., E.J.A. Escalante, G.M.T. Rodrguez and M.E. Sosa (2011). Yield and nutritional quality of snap bean in terms of biofertilization. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosys, 13: 347?355

. SAS institute (2009). The statistical analysis soft ware system for windows. Version 9.2 .SAS institute INC.,Cary NC., USA.


  • There are currently no refbacks.





About IJSBAR | Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions | Contact Us | DisclaimerFAQs 

IJSBAR is published by (GSSRR).