Comparison of Cognitive Readiness Levels of the 4th Grade Students of Primary Education by Learning Domains
Abstract
Previous acquisitions of students have a huge impact on students learning new acquisitions faster and making the same more meaningful in their minds. Today, teachers often express that cognitive readiness levels of students are not at the desired level. This study aims to identify students cognitive readiness levels and compare these levels by the learning domains. The study design is based on screening model and supported with qualitative data. The research is conducted in a state school located in one of the central districts of Ankara in the academic year 20142015. 4^{th} grade students in the school constitute the research sample, and math achievement tests and interview forms constitute the data collection tools. Ttest and oneway analysis of variance are conducted on the quantitative data and descriptive analysis is made on the qualitative data. Findings show that students readiness levels in learning domain of numbers and geometry are higher than their levels in measuring domain.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Milli E?itim Bakanl???MEB, (2009). ?lk?retim matematik dersi 15. s?n?flar ?retim program?, [Online]. Available: www.meb.gov.tr [Jan 1, 2016].
S. Griffin and R. Case. Rethinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, vol. 3(1), pp. 149, 1997.
U.S. Department of EducationUSDE (2008). The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel, [Online]. Available: www.ed.gov [Dec 8, 2015].
D. Fuchs, L.S. Fuchs and K. Karns. Enhancing kindergartners mathematical development: Effects of peerassisted learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, vol. 101(5), pp. 495510, 2001.
C. Sophian. Mathematics for the future: Developing a head start curriculum to support mathematics learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 19(1), pp. 5981, 2004.
D. H. Clements and J. Sarama. Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 38(2), pp. 136163, 2007.
MEB, (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. s?n?flar) ?retim program?, [Online]. Available: www.meb.gov.tr [Jan 1, 2016].
N.C. Jordon, D. Kaplan and L.B. Hanich. Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a twoyear longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 94(3), pp. 586597, 2002.
Y. Baykul and N. Tertemiz. ?lk?retim birinci, ikinci ve nc s?n?f matematik program? zerine bir de?erlendirme. E?itim ve Bilim Dergisi, vol. 29(131), pp. 4049, 2004
N. Ekizo?lu and M. Tezer. ?lk?retim ?rencilerinin matematik dersine ynelik tutumlar? ile matematik ba?ar? puanlar? aras?ndaki ili?ki. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 2(1), pp. 4357, 2007.
A. Kk and B. Demir. ?lk?retim 68. s?n?flarda matematik ?retiminde kar??la??lan baz? kavram yan?lg?lar? zerine bir al??ma. Dicle niversitesi Ziya Gkalp E?itim Fakltesi Dergisi, vol. 13, pp. 97112, 2009.
Y. Dede and Z. Argn. Starting point of mathematical thinking: The role of mathematical concepts. Educational Administration in Theory & Practice, vol. 39, pp. 338355, 2004.
Z. Argn, A. Ar?kan, S. Bulut and S. Hal?c?o?lu. Temel Matematik Kavramlar?n Knyesi. Ankara: Gazi, 2014, pp. 3.
C. M. Connell and R. J. Prinz. The impact of child care and parentchild interactions on school readiness and social skills development for lowincome African American children. Journal of School Psychology, vol. 40(2), pp. 177193, 2002.
A. Do?anay and A.P. Bal. ?lk?retim be?inci s?n?f matematik ?retiminde ?renci ba?ar?s?n?n llmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada E?itim Bilimleri, vol. 10(1), pp. 151215, 2010.
G. Harman and D. eliker. E?itimde haz?r bulunu?lu?un nemi zerine bir derleme al??mas?. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, vol. 1(3), pp. 147156, 2012.
L.S. Fuchs and D. Fuchs. Mathematical problemsolving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 35, pp. 563573, 2002.
M. nal. E?itim fakltelerinde ortak ders olarak okutulan yabanc? dil derslerinde ?rencilerin bili?sel haz?rbulunu?luk dzeylerinin akademik ba?ar?ya etkisi. M.A. thesis, University of Gazi, Turkey, 2005.
M. nal and M.. zdemir. E?itim fakltelerinde ortak ders olarak okutulan yabanc? dil derslerinde ?rencilerin bili?sel haz?rbulunu?luk dzeylerinin akademik ba?ar?ya etkisi. Ahi Evran niversitesi K?r?ehir E?itim Fakltesi Dergisi, vol. 9(1), pp. 1322, 2008.
J.A. Van De Walle, K.S. Karp and J.M. BayWilliams. ?lkokul ve ortaokul matemati?i: Geli?imsel yakla??mla ?retim. Ankara: Nobel, 2013, pp. 7587.
S. Vaughn et al. Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, vol. 39(1), pp. 321, 2010.
K. Yenilmez and . Kakmac?. ?lk?retim yedinci s?n?f ?rencilerinin matematikteki haz?rbulunu?luk dzeyi. Kastamonu E?itim Dergisi, vol. 16(2), pp. 529542, 2008.
N. Karasar. Bilimsel ara?t?rma yntemleri. Ankara: Pegem, 2011, pp. 7779.
?. Bykztrk, E. K?l? akmak, .E. Akgn, ?. Karadeniz and F. Demirel. Bilimsel Ara?t?rma Yntemleri. Ankara: PegemAkademi, 2013, pp. 245.
E. Fidan. ?lkokul ?rencileri iin matematik dersi say?lar ?renme alan?nda ba?ar? testi geli?tirilmesi. M.A. thesis, University of Ankara, Turkey, 2013.
S. Olkun, Z. Akkurt Denizli, S. Kozan and N. Ayy?ld?z. ?lkokul ?rencileri iin matematik dersi geometri ve lme ?renme alanlar?nda ba?ar? testi geli?tirilmesi. XII. Ulusal S?n?f ?retmenli?i E?itimi Sempozyumu, 2013, pp.7983.
I. Oral and E. McGivney. Trkiyede matematik ve fen bilimleri alanlar?nda ?renci performans? ve ba?ar?n?n belirleyicileri. E?itim Reformu Giri?imi, pp. 1124, 2013.
Refbacks
 There are currently no refbacks.
