A Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making Method for Supplier Selection

Jamil Ahmad, Juiping Xu, Muhammad Nazam, Muhammad Kashif Javed

Abstract


One of the important stages in supply chain management is called supplier selection. It is a highly important multiple criteria group decision making problem because the supplier performance has become a crucial element in a companys quality success or failure and clearly influences the responsiveness of the industry or company. They have a key role on cost, delivery, quality and service in achieving the objective of the company in supply chain process. In this study, a multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) technique based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method is presented to solve the supplier selection problem. Fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method is developed to deal with conflicting and non-commensurable criteria. The defuzzification can be carried out immediately after the aggregation of individual preference or after computing the separation values. Linguistic variables are also used by decision makers to assess the weights and ratings for the given criteria. A numerical example of the selection of suitable supplier for Lucky Cement Factory Limited (LCL) in Pakistan is used to illustrate the application of the proposed approach.



Keywords


Multiple criteria group decision making; Supplier selection in Supply chain management;Triangular fuzzy variables; Linguistic VIKOR

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Massenet, J.V. Riera, J. Torrens, E.H. Viedma, A new linguistic computational model based on discrete fuzzy numbers for computing with words Information Sciences, 258277-290, (2014).

Z. Xu Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relationsInformation Science, 178 (15) 452-467, (2008).

L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoningInformation Science, 8 (3) 199-249, (1975).

C.-T. Chen, C.-T. Lin, S.-F. Huang, A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain managementInternational Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2) 289-301, (2006).

A. Marcus, A. Fremeth, Green management matters regardlessThe Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (3) 17-26, (2009).

J.D Linton, R. Klassen, V. Jayaraman, Sustainable supply chains: An introduction Journal of Operations Management, 25 (6) 1075-1082, (2007).

A. Genovese, S.C Lenny Koh, G. Bruno, E. Esposito, Greener supplier selection: State of the art and some empirical evidence International Journal of Production Research, 51 (10) 2868-2886, (2013).

R. Dekker, J. Bloemhof, I. Mallidis, Operations research for green logistics An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges European Journal of Operational Research,219 671-679, (2012).

F.E. Boran, S. Gen, M. Kurt, D. Akay, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method Expert System with Application 36 (8) 11363-11368, (2009).

M. Dursun, E.E. Karsak, A QFD based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selectionApplied Mathematical Modeling, 37 5864-5875, (2013).

H.S. Kilic, An integrated approach for supplier selection in multi-item or multi-supplier environment Applied Mathematical Modeling, 37 7752-7763, (2013).

C-N. Liao H-P. Kao, Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming Computers and Industrial Engineering, 58 571-577, (2010).

J. Rezaei, P.B.M. Fahim, L. Tavasszy, Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHPExpert Systems with Applications, 41 8165-8179, (2014).

A. Dargia, A. Anjomshoaea, M.R. Galankashia, A. Memaria, M.B. Md. Tapa, Supplier Selection: A Fuzzy-ANP ApproachProcedia Computer Science 31 691- 700, ( 2014 ).

X-Y. You, J-X. You, H-C Liu, L. Zhen, Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic informationExpert Systems with Applications, 42 1906-1916, (2015).

F.R. Lima Junior, L. Osiro, L.C.R. Carpinettia, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection Applied Soft Computing, 21 194-209, (2014).

S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Multiple criteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstructionJournal of Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17 (3) 211-220, (2002).

S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSISEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 156 (2) 445-455, (2004).

A.A Bazzazi,M. Osanloo, B. Karimi, Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (3) 2550-2556, (2011).

A. Jahan,F. Mustapha, M.Y. Ismail, S.M. Sapuan, and M. Bahraminasab, A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selectionMaterial Design, 32 (3) 1215-1221, (2011).

M.S. Kuo, G.S. Liang, Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (3) 1304-1312, (2011).

A. Shemshadi, H. Shirazi, M. Toreihi, M.J. Tarokh, A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weightingExpert System with Application, 38 (10) 12160-12167, (2011).

G.N. Yenur, N.C. Demirel, Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment Expert System with Application, 39 (3) 3702-3707, (2012).

Y.B. Ju, A. Wang, Extension of VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information Applied Mathematical Modeling, 37 (5) 3112-3125, (2013).

S.P.Wan, Q.Y. Wang, J.Y. Dong, The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers Knowledge-Based Systems, 52 65-77, (2013).

T.H. Chang, Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan Information Sciences, 271 196-212, (2014).

Y. Kim, E.S. Chung, Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South KoreaApplied Mathematical Modeling, 37 (22) 9419-9430, (2013).

H. Safari, Z. Faraji, S. Majidian, Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKORJournal of Intelligent Manufacturing, DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0880-0, (2014).

L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy setsInformation and Control, 8 (3) 338-353, (1965).

A. Kaufmann, M.M. Gupta, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1991.

S.J. Chen, C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1992.

M. Sakawa, & R. Kubota, Fuzzy programming for multiobjective job scheduling with fuzzy processing time and fuzzy duedate through genetic algorithms European journal of Operational Research, 120 (2) 393-407, (2000).

E.H. Viedma, L. Martinez, F. Mata, F. Chiclana, A consensus support systems model for group decision making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relationsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 13 644-658, (2005).

S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods European Journal of Operational Research, 178 (2) 514-529, (2007).

P. Moeinzadeh, A. Hajfathaliha, A combined fuzzy decision making approach to supply chain risk assessment International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5 859-875, (2010).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 
 
  
 

 

  


About IJSBAR | Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions | Contact Us | DisclaimerFAQs 

IJSBAR is published by (GSSRR).